International Research Journal of Biological Sciences ___________________________________ ISSN 2278-3202Vol. 4(7), 59-64, July (2015) Int. Res. J. Biological Sci. International Science Congress Association 59 In vitro Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Some Plant Leaf Extracts against Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli Isolated from Seeds of Lentil Lens culinaris Medik.)Kulshrestha S., Chaturvedi S., Jangir R. and Agrawal K.Department of Botany, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur- 302004, Rajasthan, INDIA Available online at: www.isca.in, www.isca.me Received 20th June 2015, revised 4th July 2015, accepted 10th July 2015 Abstract Antibacterial activity of some plant extracts against Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli (Xap) was evaluated in vitro. Xap is a Gram negative seed borne pathogen. It was found associated with seeds of lentil and caused bacterial leaf spot disease. Six plant leaf extracts (aqueous and methanolic) were evaluated in different concentrations for their antibacterial activity against Xap through disc diffusion method. Mint (Mentha piperita), black plum (Syzygium cumini) and datura (Datura metel) gave inhibition activity in both aqueous and methanolic extracts while winter cherry (Withania sominifera) showed inhibition only by methanolic extract. Three plant extracts of mint, black plum and datura also improved seed germination and controlled the pathogen on seed treatment significantly at 1% (p0.01 %). Highest activity was observed in methanolic extract of mint at a concentration of 250 mg/ml showing mean inhibition zone of 12.1mm and 12.5 mm with IA value of 440.1 mm2 and 471.0 mm respectively. Keywords: Antibacterial activity, leaf extracts, disc diffusion method, seed treatment method.Introduction Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli (E. F. Smith) Dowson is a seed borne bacterial pathogen that causes bacterial leaf spot in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)1-3 and common bacterial blight in beans. It is Gram-negative aerobic rods belonging to the family Pseudomonodaceae. The pathogen causes disease actively at high temperature (up to 32°C) and high rainfall and humidity. The pathogen causes destruction of seedlings and adult plants and thus results in yield reduction. For control of pathogen, pathogen-free seeds and rotation and ploughing of infested straw can be used5,6. Use of resistant cultivars, sprays and dust can also control the pathogenbut it is controlled normally through chemical bactericides. In recent years, consumers have become more concerned about the safety of food since high use of chemical fungicides, insecticides and bactericides for the control of various plant diseases. These also cause water and soil pollution. They are costly as well as cause health hazards. So it is imperative to use the cost effective and eco-friendly ways to control the diseases through botanicals having antibacterial properties against plant pathogens. In the present study, leaves of six plant species were used for in vitro evaluation of antibacterial activity against Xap isolated from seeds of lentil. The leaf extracts were also tested for their effect on germination of lentil seeds. Material and Methods X. axonopodis pv. phaeoli was isolated from naturally infected seeds of lentil and identified through various biochemical tests and molecular assay. Leaves ofMint (Mentha piperita), black plum (Syzygium cumini), datura (Datura metel), spinach(Spinacia oleracea), winter cherry (Withania sominifera) and periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus) were used for preparation of aqueous and methanolic extracts and their efficacy was evaluated against Xap isolated from lentil seeds. Aqueous extracts were prepared by macerating surface sterilized fresh plant leaves in sterile distilled water in 1:1 w/v. By using double layered sterilized cheese cloth, the extract was filtered and this filtrate was used as 100% concentration. The extract was filtered through double layered sterilized cheese cloth and this filtrate was used as 100% concentration. The extract was further diluted to 50% and 25% concentration with sterilized distilled water. Methanolic extracts were prepared by cold extraction method. Ten gram of powdered leaf was dispersed in 100 ml methanol solution (95%) and kept for 24 to 48 hrs in an incubator shaker at 200 rpm. The obtained suspension was filtered with Whatman filter paper no.1. Methanol was evaporated from it. The dried extract was stored under dry condition at 4º C. Methanolic extract was used at a concentration of 100 mg/ml, 150 mg/ml and 250 mg/ml. In vitro evaluation of plant extracts was done by two methods 1 Disc diffusion method and 2 Seed treatment method. Research Journal of Biological Sciences ___________________________________________________________ ISSN 2278-3202 Vol. 4(7), 59-64, July (2015) Int. Res. J. Biological Sci. International Science Congress Association 60 Disc diffusion method: Two isolates of Xap (Ac. nos. LC-XAP-5 and LC-XAP- 17) were used and 100µl of pathogen was spread on nutrient agar plates and sterilized discs (5 mm) of Whatman filter paper pre-soaked in extract were further placed on these agar plates. For check discs soaked in distilled water (for aqueous extract) and methanol (for methanolic extracts) were used and placed in the centre of NA plates. The incubation temperature was 30±2°C applied for 3 to 5 days. Clearance of bacterial culture or zone of inhibition around the discs was recorded. Inhibition annulus (mm) was calculated for the comparison of antibacterial activity of the test plant extracts9,10. Inhibition Annulus (IA) = (R-R) (R+R) Where R1 = Radius of inhibition zone + radius of filter paper disc, R = Radius of filter paper disc and = 3.14 Seed treatment method: Two seed samples (Ac. nos. LC- 102 and LC- 117) naturally infected with Xap were used and 3 replicates of 100 seeds per sample were soaked for 1 hr in aqueous and methanolic extracts. Seeds soaked in distilled water, served as check. The seeds were incubated on moistened blotter papers for 7 days to evaluate the effect of leaf extracts on germination of lentil seeds11. Percent germination of seeds and percent control of pathogen was calculated. Percent control = C - T X100 C Where: C= Incidence in Check, T = Incidence in Treated Seeds Results and Discussion In disc diffusion method, results were measured in the form of inhibition annulus (IA) values (mm) and zone of inhibition (mm). Two isolates of Xap were used in disc diffusion method. Spinach and periwinkle did not show any inhibition zone against Xap for both the isolates. Mint, black plum and datura gave inhibition zone in both methanolic and aqueous extracts while winter cherry showed inhibition zone only in methanolic extract. Highest activity was observed in methanolic extract of mint at a concentration of 250 mg/ml (inhibition zone of 12.1mm and 12.5 mm with IA value of 440.1 mm2 and 471.0 mmrespectively) (figure-1D and table-1) and lowest activity was observed in aqueous extract of datura (4.8 mm and 4.5 zone of inhibition with IA value of 52.7 mm2 and 43.9 mm2 at maximum concentration of 100%). Aqueous extract of mint showed inhibition zone of 7.3mm and 8.2 mm with IA value of 147.7 mm2 and 191.5 mm at 100% concentration. Result showed significance at 1% (p0.01) (figure-1A and table-1). Germination percent was observed highest by the aqueous extract of mint (98.3%) while lowest germination was observed by the aqueous extract of datura (85.3%). Extracts of datura showed variation in seed germination at different concentrations. Percent control of pathogen was highest by methanolic extract of datura in both the samples (69.7 and 69.4% respectively) among three extracts (table-2). The above mentioned plants were selected because of their different medicinal properties, antifungal effect and herbicidal activities. Leaves of Mentha piperita contains many active compounds such as menthol, menthone, methyl acetate, menthofuran and limnone etc., due to which it shows a significant antibacterial activity12,13. Ethanolic extract of black plum was found to possess high mean total activity against X. campestris and ethanolic extract of its seeds significantly reduced the ability of the pathogen to retrieve growth on extract free nutrient medium which can be described as post extract effect (PEE)14. Kagale et al.15 have tested the antibacterial activity of D. metel leaf extracts against R. solani and X. oryzae and observed that 90% of colonies were inhibited in medium amended with D. metel extract when compared to the control. Ranaware et al.16screened seven plant species against Alternaria carthami, among these Allium sativum, Datura metel and Ocimum sanctum were found more inhibitory activity against the pathogen. Shahnaz et al.17reported the inhibitory effect of Datura alba against Macrophomina phaseolina and Rhizoctonia solani. Besides the well known antibacterial effect of these plants, it is necessary to assess their activity against the pathogen and find their germination efficiency after treatment for the sake of crop surveillance and disease prevention both. It is probably because inhibitory activities of plants vary for pathogens and varying effect on germination as it was observed that aqueous extract of seeds and leaves of D. stramonium had concentration dependent effect on tested species i.e. as the concentration of seed and leaf extracts increased from 0% to 100% its inhibitory effects also increased on tested species18. Shafique et al.19 observed that aqueous treatment of black plum for 10 min generally enhanced germination of wheat grains as compared to control. By contrast, 20 min. treatment of S. cumini extracts reduced the germination by 24%. The inhibitory effects on all tested species increased as the concentration of both extracts increased from 0% to 100%18. Shafique et al.19 observed that aqueous treatment of black plum for 10 min generally enhanced germination of wheat grains as compared to control. By contrast, 20 min. treatment of S. cumini extracts reduced the germination by 24%. Research Journal of Biological Sciences ___________________________________________________________ ISSN 2278-3202 Vol. 4(7), 59-64, July (2015) Int. Res. J. Biological Sci. International Science Congress Association 61 Table-1 In vitro evaluation of different leaf extracts for inhibition of X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli by filter paper disc method Isolate no. LC-XAP- 5 Plant Names Aqueous extract Methanolic extract 25% 50% 100% 100mg 150mg 250mg IZ IA RIZ IA RIZ IA RIZ IA RIZ IA RIZ IA Mentha arvensis 5.2 65.2** 6.8 125.5** 7.3 147.7** 11.3 381.3** 11.4 388.4** 12.1 440.1** Syzygium cumini 3.1 10.5* 3.9 28.1** 5.7 82.3** 5.2 65.2** 7.2 143.1** 11.9 425.0** Datura metel 3.2 12.5* 3.7 23.3** 4.8 52.7* 6.1 97.2** 6.7 121.3** 8.2 191.5** Withania sominifera - - - - - - 5.5 75.4** 5.8 86.0** 6.2 101.1** S.Em. 2.92 3.15 10.03 6.59 3.02 8.66 CD at 5% 11.47 12.39 39.45 22.83 10.46 30 CD at 1% 18.97 20.5 65.27 34.57 15.83 45.42 Isolate no. LC-XAP- 17 Plant Names Aqueous Extract Methanolic Extract 25% 50% 100% 100mg/ml 150mg/ml 250mg/ml IZ IA RIZ IA RIZ IA RIZ IA RIZ IA RIZ IA Mentha arvensis 5.0 58.9** 6.3 106.3** 8.2 191.5** 11.4 388.5** 11.6 402.9** 12.5 471.0** Syzygium cumini 2.9 6.8 NS 4.0 30.6* 5.7 82.4** 5.6 78.8** 7.8 171.4** 12.2 447.7** Datura metel 2.9 6.8 NS 3.0 8.6 NS 4.5 43.9* 6.1 97.2** 6.2 101.1** 7.7 166.5** Withania sominifera - - - - - - 5.2 65.3** 5.6 78.8** 5.7 82.4** S.Em. 4.96 6.52 8.39 5.76 9.66 15.63 CD at 5% 19.48 25.64 32.97 19.94 33.45 54.15 CD at 1% 32.23 42.42 54.56 30.19 50.65 81.99 Values are the mean of three replicates; RIZ – radius of inhibition zone (mm); IA- inhibition annulus (mm); **Significant at 1%; *significant at 5%; NS- Non significant Research Journal of Biological Sciences ___________________________________________________________ ISSN 2278-3202 Vol. 4(7), 59-64, July (2015) Int. Res. J. Biological Sci. International Science Congress Association 62 Table- 2Percent control of X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli by leaf extract of different botanicals in seeds of lentil Plant extracts Conc. (%) Seed sample - Ac. No. LC- 102 Aqueous extract Methanolic extract Seed Germination (%)** Incidence of Pathogen (%)** Control of Pathogen (%)** Conc. in mg/ml Seed Germination (%)** Incidence of Pathogen (%)** Control of Pathogen (%)** Check 78.7( 62.51) 36.7 (37.29) 0 (0.00) 75 (60.00) 37.3 (37.64) 0 (0.00) Mentha arvensis 25 85.3 (67.45) 28.3 (32.14) 22.7 (28.45) 100 81.7 (64.67) 21.3 (27.49) 42.9 (40.92) 50 92.7 (74.32) 20.3 (26.78) 44.6 (41.90) 150 84.0 (66.42) 18.7 (25.62) 50.0 (45.00) 100 97.3 (80.54) 18.7 (25.62) 49.1 (44.48) 250 89.7 (71.28) 15.3 (23.03) 58.9 (50.13) Syzygium cumini 25 87.0 (68.87) 20.3 (26.78) 44.6 (41.90) 100 85.3 (67.45) 22.3 (28.18) 40.2 (39.35) 50 89.3 (70.91) 15.3 (23.03) 58.2 (49.72) 150 87.7 (69.47) 17.3 (24.58) 53.6 (47.06) 100 93.7 (75.46) 12.7 (20.88) 65.5 (54.03) 250 90.3 (71.85) 11.3 (19.64) 69.7 (56.60) Datura metel 25 91.3 (72.84) 21.7 (27.76) 40.9 (39.76) 100 92.0 (73.57) 22.3 (28.18) 40.2 (39.35) 50 95.0 (77.08) 17.3 (24.58) 52.7 (46.55) 150 89.3 (70.91) 15.7 (23.34) 58.0 (49.60) 100 92.7 (74.32) 12.7 (20.88) 65.5 (54.03) 250 91.7 (73.26) 11.3 (19.64) 69.7 (56.60) S.Em. 0.37 0.32 0.36 0.3 0.23 0.29 CD at 5 % 1.1 0.96 1.06 0.89 0.67 0.87 CD at 1 % 1.5 1.31 1.45 1.22 0.92 1.2 Plant extracts Conc. (%) Seed sample - Ac. No. LC- 117 Aqueous extract Methanolic extract Seed Germination (%)** Incidence of Pathogen (%)** Control of Pathogen (%)** Conc. in mg/ml Seed Germination (%)** Incidence of Pathogen (%)** Control of Pathogen (%)** Check 73.0 (58.69) 38.7 (38.47) 0 (0.00) 76.7 (61.14) 40.3 (39.41) 0 (0.00) Mentha arvensis 25 90.3 (71.85) 26.7 (31.11) 31.0 (33.83) 100 85.3 (67.45) 22.3 (28.18) 44.6 (41.96) 50 95.7 (78.03) 22.7 (28.45) 41.4 (40.05) 150 87.7 (69.47) 19.3 (26.06) 52.1 (46.20) 100 98.3 (82.51) 15.3 (23.03) 60.4 (51.00) 250 92.7 (74.32) 12.7 (20.88) 68.6 (54.09) Syzygium cumini 25 87.7 (69.47) 21.7 (27.76) 44.0 (41.55) 100 82.3 (65.12) 22.7 (28.45) 43.8 (41.44) 50 91.3 (72.84) 20.7 (27.06) 46.6 (43.05) 150 89.0 (70.63) 18.7 (25.62) 53.7 (47.12) 100 95.7 (78.03) 18.3 (25.33) 52.6 (46.49) 250 93.7 (75.60) 16.0 (23.58) 60.3 (50.94) Datura metel 25 86.0 (68.03) 21.3 (27.49) 44.8 (42.02) 100 90.0 (71.56) 19.7 (26.35) 51.2 (45.69) 50 89.7 (71.28) 17.7 (24.88) 54.3 (47.47) 150 91.3 (72.84) 14.7 (22.55) 63.6 (53.89) 100 85.3 (67.45) 14.3 (22.22) 62.9 (52.48) 250 87.3 (69.12) 12.3 (20.53) 69.4 (56.42) S.Em. 0.59 0.38 0.26 0.15 0.27 0.32 CD at 5 % 1.76 1.14 0.79 0.46 0.8 0.96 CD at 1 % 2.41 1.56 1.08 0.63 1.09 1.32 Values are the mean of 3 replicates; values in parenthesis are angular transformed values; ** Significant at 1% Research Journal of Biological Sciences ___________________________________________________________ ISSN 2278-3202 Vol. 4(7), 59-64, July (2015) Int. Res. J. Biological Sci. International Science Congress Association 63 Figure-1In vitro evaluation of aqueous (100% concentration) and methanolic extracts (250mg/ml concentration) through disc diffusion method. A-C: Aqueous extract of Mint (A), Black plum (B) and Datura (C); D-G: Methanolic extract of Mint (D), Black plum (E), Datura (F) and Winter cherry (G); Check is placed in centre of Petri plate Conclusion Thus in present study mint black plumanddaturagave inhibition activity in both aqueous and methanolic extracts while winter cherryshowed inhibition only by methanolic extract against Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli isolated from seeds of lentil. No activity was found in extracts of spinachandperiwinkle.Three plant extracts mint, black plum and datura also improved seed germination and controlled the pathogen on seed treatment significantly at 1% (p0.01 %). Acknowledgement Thanks to UGC-UPE/NNF for providing financial assistance to Sanchita Kulshrestha, Surabhi Chaturvedi and Rekha Jangir. References 1.Anonymous, Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 7th Ed. Baltimore, The Williams And Wilkins Company, 147-148 (1957)2.Agarwal S.C. and Prasad K.V.V., Diseases of lentil, Science Publishers Inc., USA (1997) 3.Anonymous, (accessed on August 2011) www.ars.usda. gov/sp2userfiles/.../part2e-bacteria-phytoplasma- weeds.do, (2011) 4.CABI and EPPO, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli,Data sheet on quarantine pests, Prepared by CABI and EPPO, (Accessed in December 2014) https://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/bacteria/Xanthomonas_phaseoli/XANTPH_ds.pdf (2014)5.Saettler A.W., Common bacterial blight. In: Schwartz H.F., Galvez E.E., editors, Bean production problems in the tropics. Cali, Colombia (SA): Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, 261–283 (1989)6.Schwartz H.F. and Galvez M. (editors), Bean production problems in the tropics, 2nd ed. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, Colombia, 157–172 (1989) 7.Leakey C.L.A., A note on Xanthomonas blight of bean Phaseolus vulgaris) and prospects of its control by breeding for tolerance, Euphytica, 22, 132-140 (1973)8.Vaghasiya Y. and Chanda S., Screening of methanol and acetone extracts of fourteen Indian medicinal plants for antibacterial activity, Turk. J. Biol., 31, 243-248 (2007)9.Thornberry H.H., A paper-disc plate method for the quantitative evaluation of fungicides and bactericides, Phytopathol., 40, 950-954 (1959)10.Pal V., Jalali I. and Raju M.R.B., Exploitation of higher plants for the control of the plant bacterioses. Research Methods in Plant Sciences: Allellopathy, Plant Pathogens 3: 176-185. Narwal S S and Pal V (Eds), Scientific Publisher (India), Jodhpur (2004)11.ISTA, International rules for seed testing association Research Journal of Biological Sciences ___________________________________________________________ ISSN 2278-3202 Vol. 4(7), 59-64, July (2015) Int. Res. J. Biological Sci. International Science Congress Association 64 (ISTA), Seed Sci. and Tech.,4(3), 49-177 (1985)12.Fleming T., PDR for Herbal medicines: Medical Economic Company, JNC (1998)13.Bupesh G., Amutha S., Nandagopal, Ganeshkumar A., Sureshkumar P. and Murali K.S., Antibacterial activity of Mentha piperita L. (peppermint) from leaf extracts: A medicinal plant, Acta Agric. Slov.,1(89), 73-79 (2007)14.Darji B., Ratani J., Doshi M. and KothariV., In vitro antibacterial activity in certain plant products / seed extracts against selected Phytopathogens, Research in Pharmacy,2(6), 01-10 (2012)15.Kagale S., Marimuthu B., Thayumanavan R., Nandakumar and Samiyappan R., Antibacterial activity and induction of systemic resistance in rice by leaf extract of Datura metel against Rhizoctonia solani and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Physiol. Mol. Plant Path., 2(65), 91-100 (2004)16.Ranawane A., Singh V. and Nimbkar N., In vitro antifungal study of the efficacy of some plant extracts for inhibition of Alternaria carthami fungus, Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour., 1(3), 384-386 (2010)17.Shahnaz D., Sadia K. and Marium T., Comparative effect of plant extracts of Datura alba Ness and Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., alone or in combination with microbial antagonists for the control of root disease of cowpea and okra, Pak. J. Bot., 42(2), 1273-1279 (2010)18.Elisante F., Tarimo M.T. and Ndakidemi P.A., Allelopathic effect of seed and leaf aqueous extracts of Datura stramonium on leaf chlorophyll content, shoot and root elongation of Cenchrus ciliaris and Neonotonia wighti,. Am. J. Plant Sci., 4, 2332-2339 (2013)19.Shafique S., Javaid A., Bajwa R. and Shafique S., Effect of aqueous leaf extracts of allelopathic trees on germination and seed-borne mycoflora of wheat, Pak. J. Bot., 7(39)2619-2624 (2007)