@Research Paper
<#LINE#>Biodiversity and Conservation status of Ichthyofauna of Doria beel, Majuli, India<#LINE#>Bordoloi  @R,Hazarika @A.K, <#LINE#>1-8<#LINE#>1.ISCA-RJAVFS-2015-017.pdf<#LINE#>Department of Zoology, D.R. Collge, Golaghat, 785621, INDIA @Department of Zoology, Majuli College, Kamalabari, Majuli, INDIA<#LINE#>27/7/2005<#LINE#>25/8/2015<#LINE#>The Doria beel lies in the geographical ordinates between 26°57'30.58 N latitude and 94°10.02.36'E longitude with elevation 277ft. A survey was conducted on diversity of fish fauna of the Doria beel from January 2011 to December, 2012. Fish samples were collected from various stations of the fish landing site of the study area. During our study period we were encountered 55 species belonging to 7 orders and 19 families. Maximum diversity is observed in the family Cyprinidae which represents 18 species (32.72%) followed by Channidae 6 species, Belontidae and Chacidae each 4 species (7.27 %), Chandidae and Siluridae each 3 species (5.45 %), Cobitidae, Nandidae, Notopteridae and Mastercembelidae each 2 species (3.63 %), Anguillidae, Anabantidae, Heteropneustidae, Gobiidae, Synbranchidae, Siluridae, Claridae, Schilbeidae, Chacidae and Tetradontidae each 1 species (1.81%). According to IUCN red list category, out of 55 species, 41.8 % species are not ealuated (NE), 36.36 % species are least concern (LC), 10.9 % species are near threatened (NT), 5.45 % species are vulnerable (VU) , 3.63 % lower risk near threatened (LRnt) and 1.81% species data deficient (DD)<#LINE#>Roach J.@Conservationists name nine new biodiversity hotspots. National Geographic news@February 2, (2005)@Yes$Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca GAB and Kent J.@Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities@Nature, 403, 853-858 (2000)@Yes$KoRelat M. and Whitten T.@Freshwater Biodiversity in Asia with special reference to Fish: World Bank Tech@Paper No. 343. The world Bank, Washington, DC, 17-22,(1996)@Yes$Goswami U.C., Basistha S.K., Bora D., Shyamkumar K., Saikia B. and Changsan K.@Fish diversity of North East India, inclusive of the Himalayan and Indo Burma biodiversity hotspots zones: A checklist on their taxonomic status, economic importance, geographical distribution, present status and prevailing threats, International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation@DOI: 10.5897/IJBC11.228, Academic Journals 4(15), 592-613 (2012)@Yes$Hamilton F.B.@An account of the fishes found in the river Ganges and its branches. Edinburgh and London@Fishes Ganges, i-vii + 1-405, 1-39 (1822)@Yes$Agarwala N.K.@Limnology and fish productivity of Tamranga wetland in Bangaigaon district of Assam, India with special reference to some productivity indicator@PhD Thesis, Gauhati University, Assam, x+200 (1996)@Yes$Biswas S.P. and Boruah S.@Fisheries ecology of the North-Eastern Himalaya with special reference to the Brahmaputra River@Ecol. Eng., 16, 39-50 (2000)@Yes$Bordoloi R.@Comparative study on fish and fisheries between a closed and an open type wetland of the Jorhat@District, Assam, Ph.D. Thesis, Gauhati University (2010)@Yes$Bera S.K., Dixit S., Basumatary S.K. and Gogoi R.@Evidence of biological degradation in sediments of Deepor beel Ramsar site, Assam as inferred by degraded Palynomorphs and fungal remains@Current Science, 95(2), 178-180 (2008)@Yes$Singh A.S.K., Dakua S and Biswas S.P.@Physicochemical parameters and fish enumeration of Maijan beel (wetland) of upper Assam@Geobios, 36, 184-188 (2009)@Yes$Dakua S., Singh A.S.K., Choudhury P.P. and Biswas S.P.@A preliminary investigation on the fish and fisheries of Maijan beel in upper Assam. Indian J. Environ. and Ecoplan.@16 (1) : 263-270 (2009)@No$Abujam S.K.S., Dakua S., Bakalial B., Saikia A.K., Biswas SP and Choudhury P.@Diversity of Plankton in Maijan Beel, Upper Assam@Asian J. Exp. Biol. Sci., 2(4),562-568 (2011)@Yes$Abujam S.K.S., Paswan G., Dakua S. and Saikia A.K.@Faunal diversity and ecological status of Maijan beel (Wetland)@Fishing Chimes, 32(8), 43-48 (2012)@Yes$Hussian Md. and Biswas S.P.@Physico-chemical characteristics of a floodplain lake of Dhemaji in upper Assam@Bull. Life. Sci., 16, 81-9 (2011)@Yes$Bordoloi R.@Ichthyofaun and fish production in Potiasola wetland of the Brahmaputra basin, International Journal of Zoological Research@4(2), 27-36 (2014)@No$Bordoloi R.@A comparative study of aquatic macrophytes and its primary productivity in the closed and open type wetlands of upper reaches of the Brahmaputra River basin@J.Bio. Innov , 3(2),103–116 (2014)@Yes$Paswan G., Singh A.S.K., Biswas S.P. and Dey M.@A Study of Certain Physico-Chemical Parameters of Borsola Beel (Wetland) of Jorhat, (Ed.) Proc. National seminar on ‘Current Issues of Conservation and Wise Use of Wetlands in North Eastern Region of India@291-29 (2012)@No$Yadava Y.S. and Chandra. R.@Some Threatened Carps and Catfishes of Brahmaputra River System. In Threatened Fishes of India, edited by P.V Dehadradri@P. Das and S.R Verma. Natcon Publ., 4, 45-55 (1994)@Yes$Ghosh S.K. and Lipton A.P.@Ichthyofauna of the N.E.H. Region with special reference to their economic importance@ICAR Spl. Bulletin No.1 (ICAR Research Complex, Shillong), 119-126 (1992)@Yes$Sen T.K.@The Fish fauna of Assam and the Neighbouring North-Eastern States of India, Records of the Zoological Survey of India@Misc. ace. Paper no. 64, ZSI, Calcutta, 216 (1985)@Yes$Mahanta P.C., Srivastava S.M. and Paul S.K.@Preliminay aassessment of fish germplasm resources of North East Region to evolve strategy for conservation@New Agriculturist, 8(1) (1998)@No$Sinha M.@Fish Genetic Resources of the North Eastern Region of India@Inland Fish. Soc. India, 26(1), 1-19(1994)@Yes$Nath P. and Dey S.C.@Fish and Fisheries of North eastern India@Arunachal Pradesh, India, I, 140 (1997)@Yes$Sen N.@Occurrence, distribution and status of diversified fish fauna of North East India. In: Fish Germplasm Inventory and Conservation in North East India (Eds. A.G.Ponniah and U.K. Sarkar)@NBFGR, Lucknow (2000)@Yes$NBFGR@Participatory approach for fish biodiversity conservation on North East India@411 (2002)@No$Talwar P.K. and Jhingran V.G.@Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries@I and II, 1158 (1991)@Yes$Jayaram K.C.@The Freshwater Fishes of the Indian Region, Narendra Publ. House@Delhi, 551 (1999)@Yes$Vishwanath W., Lakra W.S. and Sarkar U.K.@Fishes of Northeast India, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources@Lucknow, India, 264 (2007)@Yes$Jhingran V.G. and Dutta P.@The Inland fisheries resources of India@Indian Soc. Agric. Stast, 20, 68-78 (1968)@Yes$Dutta M.K., Barman S. and Aggarwal S.P.@A study of erosion-deposition processes around Majuli Island@Assam, Earth Science, 3, 206-216 (2010)@Yes$@The Red List of Threatened Species@Version 2015 .2, <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 21 July, (2015)@Yes
<#LINE#>Abiotic Status of River Jhelum with Special Reference to its Ichthyofaunal Diversity<#LINE#>Jan@R.,Gupta@R.,Najar @M.A.,Zuber @S.M. <#LINE#>1-7<#LINE#>2.ISCA-RJAVFS-2015-019.pdf<#LINE#>1Deptartment of Life Science, Dr. C.V. Raman University, Chattisgarh, INDIA@1Deptartment of Life Science, Dr. C.V. Raman University, Chattisgarh, INDIA@Department of Zoology, Govt. Degree College (Boys) Anantnag, Kashmir, INDIA@Department of Zoology, Govt. Degree College (Boys) Anantnag, Kashmir, INDIA<#LINE#>4/9/2015<#LINE#>21/9/2015<#LINE#>During the course of present study, the abiotic factors investigated recorded remarkable variation at each of the three study sites. While pH, NO3-N, Total Dissolved Solids, BOD and COD recorded increasing values towards the downstream sections of the river, DO, Ca and alkalinity recorded decreasing values towards the downstream areas of the river. A total of seven species belonging to two families Cyprinidae and Salmonidae were collected. While Cyprinidae is represented by five species viz., Schizothorax plagiostomus, S. curvifrons, S. esocinus, S. labiatus and Cyprinus carpio, the Salmonidae family is represented by only two species, Salmo trutta fario and Salmo gairdneri. While Schizothoracines dominated at sites II and III, Salmonids were found in abundance at site I. In this lotic system, the diversity and distribution of fishes were uneven. The un-even distribution and diversity may be due to changing water quality status.<#LINE#>Wetzel R.G.@Limnology, W.B. Sunders Co.@Ltd. (1983)@Yes$APHA@Standard Methods for Examination of water and wastewater.20th Ed. American Health association@Washington, D.C. (1998)@Yes$Kullander S.O., Fang F., Delling B. and Ahlander E.@The Fishes of the Kashmir Valley, In: L. Nyman (ed) River Jhelum, Kashmir Valley, Impact on the aquatic environment@SWEDMAR, Sweden, 100-167, (1999)@No$Dallas F.H. and Day J.A.@The effect of water quality variables on Aquatic Ecosystems: Review, Report to the Water Research Commission@WRC Report No., TT224/04, (2004)@Yes$Zubair S.M. and Ahrar A.H.@Characterization of abiotic status of Lake Mansar at Surinsar@Mansar Ramsar site in the NW Himalayas, Intl. J. Sci. Tech. Res., 2(11), 50-65(2013)@Yes$Eppley R.W.@Major cations, In: Physiology and Biochemistry of algae (Lewin, R.A. Ed.)@Academic Press, New York, 255-266 (1962)@No$Epstein E.@Mineral metabolism, In: plant Biochemistry (Bonner, J. and Varner, J .E. Eds.)@Academic press, New York, 438- 466 (1965)@No$WQM Report@Annual report on water quality monitoring of upper and lower lakes of Bhopal@Vol I and II, (1999)@No$USEPA@Total maximum daily load (TMDL) for dissolved oxygen and biochemical oxygen demand in St. John River above Sawgrass Lake (WBID 2893X) middle St. Johns River basin@Florida@No$Ganapati S.V.@Ecology of Tropical waters, Proc. Symp. Algalogy@ICAR New Delhi. 204 – 218, (1960)@No$Lone S.A., Ansari F., Lori S.M. and Zuber S.M.@Physicochemical characterization of lotic systems of Kashmir: A case study of river Jhelum@Intl. J. Sci. Nat.,4(4), 579-582 (2013)@No$Hayes J.W., Leathwick J.R. and Hanchet S.M.@Fish distribution patterns and their association with environmental factors in the Mokau River catchment@New Zealand, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 23, 171-180, 551-559, (2010)@Yes