International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Investigating the Effective Factors on Auditing risks from the viewpoints of official auditors of Iran

Author Affiliations

  • 1Accounting Department, Islamic Azad University-Khorasgan Branch Iran, Esfahan, IRAN

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 4, Issue (7), Pages 26-32, July,2 (2015)


This research dealt with investigation of the effective factors on auditing risks from the viewpoints of official auditors of Iran. The present research was an applied research with regards to its aims and was descriptive-surveying research with regards to its methodology. The statistical population considered in this research included all the auditing firms of Iran, having 70 official auditors who are working professionally. To achieve more precise results, all the firms as the members of the statistical population were examined and the relevant questionnaires were delivered to all the mentioned companies. Hence, the sampling size was equal to the statistical population and the researcher- prepared questionnaire with 31 questions and multiple choice answers (with 5 different selections) of Likert was used to collect the required information. The validity of the questionnaire contents was approved by referring to the elite specialists and experts. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated by alpha-Cranach formula to be 0.87. Independent t-test and t-Hotelling test. The results showed that the observed “t about the effective factors on auditing risks including lack of collecting adequate evidence and created limitations in auditing actions, lack of planning in auditing process, lack of internal control systems in companies, the company size and its’ type of activities, limitations in executing contenting tests, are larger than the critical value in the table in 5% of error level. Thus, according to the official auditors of Iran, the mentioned components have been greater than the average and they are therefore effective on the auditing risks and in case the extent of users of financial statements and their reliance on these statements are less than the critical values in the table; in 5% error level, the mentioned components are lower than the average level, according to the official auditors of Iran(Esfahan), not to effect on the auditing risks. On the other side, the relations between the effective factors on auditing risks are not similar and hence, lack of collecting adequate evidence and created limitations have the greatest roles, and the extent of financial statement users and their reliance on these statements have the lowest roles on the auditing risks.


  1. Imoniana, Joshua Onome end Gartner, Ivan Ricardo, Towards a Muiti – Criteria Approach to Corporate Auditing Risk Assessment in Brazilian Context", available at:, (2007)
  2. Bedard J., Mock. T. and Wright A., Evidential planning in Auditing: A review of the Empirical Research, Journal of Accounting Literature, 18, (1999)
  3. Khurana I.K. and Ramana K.K., Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of big 4 versus non-big 4 audit: evidence from Anglo: American countries, The Accounting Review,79(2), 473- 495 (2004)
  4. Law, phili Auditors perceptions of reasonable assurance in audit work and the effectiveness of the audit risk model, Asian Review of Accounting,16(2), 160178 (2008)
  5. Bell T.B., Peecher M. E. and Solomn I., The 21 st century public company audit: Conceptual elements of KPMGs global audit methodology, KPMG , LLP, (2005)
  6. Blay Allen Kizirian Tim and Sneathen Dwight, Evidential Effort And Assessment In Auditing, Journal of Business and Economics Research,6, 39-59, (2008)
  7. Colbert J.L. and Alderman C.W., A risk, driven approach to the internal Audit, Managerial Auditing Journal,10(2),38–44, (1995)
  8. Esmaili A., Application of risk-based Audit in Audit Organization, Tehran: Vahed-e Olum Tahqiqat-e Daneshgah-e Eslami, (1379)
  9. American Institute of Certified Public Accountant .Statement on Auditing Standards No. 39. Audit Sampling; New York. AICPA, (1981)
  10. American Institute of Certified Public Accountant, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 47. Audit Risk and Materiality in Audit; New York. AICPA, (1981)
  11. Australian Accounting Research Foundation Auditing Standards Board.Statement and auditing Practice AUP No. 27, Materiality and Audit Risk (1985)
  12. Australian Accounting Research Foundation Auditing Standards Board. Statement and auditing Practice AUP No. 30. Inherent and control Risk Assessments and their impact on Substantive Procedures, (1985)
  13. Australian Accunting Research Foundation Auditing Standards Board, Statement and auditing Practic AUP No. 30. Inherent and control Risk Assessments and theirimpact on Substantive Procedures, (1990)
  14. Auditing Practices Board. Statement of Auditing Standards No. 300. Accounting and Internal Systems and Risk Assessment, (1995)
  15. Hassas Y. and V. E. Iranian auditors’ perception of inherent risk, Accountant Monthly, 7, 1-32, (1383)
  16. Blokdijk J, Tesets of control in the audit risk model: effective?", International Journal of Auditing,8, 185-94, (2004)
  17. Roy A.K., Risk Based Internal Audit-Need for Such Approach in Banking Sector for Implementation of Basel Ii Accord: Bangladesh Perspective, The Bangladesh Accountant,15(1), 21-32, (2008)
  18. Arjmandi H., Fundamental concepts of audit risk, Expert Accountants Association Monthly,137, 3-6, (2000)
  19. Hajiha, Investigating the relationship between inherent and control risks in risk-based audit approach, Financial Accounting Scientific-Research Quarterly,(2)6, 95-120Z, (2010)
  20. BehAyin Y., The application of fuzzy set theory in the qualitative assessment of audit risk model components, Accountant Monthly,(163), 72-75, (2004)
  21. Mindak M and Heltzer W, Corporate environmental responsibility and audit risk, Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(8), 697-733 (2011)
  22. Woodhead A.D., The other Audit Risk: the impact of flase rejection on audit planning, Emerald Managerial Auditing Journal,12(1), 4-8, (1997)
  23. Houghton C.W. and Fogarty J.A, Ingerent risk, Auditing: A Journal of practice and Theory,10(1), (1991)
  24. Peters J.M., Lewis B.L. and Dhar. V., Assessing inherent risk during audit planning: the development of a knowledge based model, Accounting , Organizations and Society,14(4), (1989)
  25. Spring Dirsmith M. and. Haskins M., Inherent Risk Assessment and Audit Firm Technology : A Contrast in Word Theories , Accounting, Organization and Society,16(1), (1991)
  26. Khodadad A.M., Studying the reasons why audit risk assessment is not conducted in Iran (MA Thesis): Faculty of Management, Tehran Unversity, (2004)
  27. Hylas R.E. and. Ashton RH, Audit in detection of financial statement errors, the Accounting Review,57(4), October, (1983)
  28. Andrew W, Process Risk and Reliability Management. Chapter 14: Audits and Assessments, Science Direct., 693-726 (2010)
  29. Khani Hamid and Yazdani Qanbar Ali, Effective Factors on Determination of Audit Fees in Iran, Research Journal of Recent Sciences ,1(6), (2012)
  30. Saeid Anvarkhatibi, Mohammadreza Safashur and Jamal Mohammadi, The Effect of Auditors Opinions on Shares Prices and Returns in Tehran Stock Exchange, Research Journal of Management Sciences,1(1), (2012)