International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Relationship between EFL Learners’ Multiple Intelligence Scores, Gender, and Their Vocabulary Knowledge

Author Affiliations

  • 1 Department of English, Khorasgan (Isfahan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, IRAN
  • 2 Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, IRAN

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 4, Issue (12), Pages 29-36, December,2 (2015)


This study was designed to investigate the relationship between EFL learners multiple intelligence (MI) scores, their gender, and their vocabulary knowledge. That is, an attempt was made to determine which of the intelligences (naturalist intelligence, musical intelligence, logical mathematical intelligence, existential intelligence, interpersonal intelligence, bodily-kinesthetic intelligence, linguistic intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence, and visual-special intelligence) can better predict vocabulary knowledge of the EFL learners. Furthermore, this study sought to find the difference between male and female learners in terms of their vocabulary size, and different types of intelligences. To pursue these objectives, a population of 88 students consisting of 64 females and 24 males were randomly selected from Khorasgan Azad University. The participants were M.A. students of English teaching and English translation. The students were asked to take part in two different kinds of tests. The first one was a standardized English language vocabulary test, i.e. the Receptive Nation Level Test. The second instrument was the Persian Version of McKenzies Multiple Intelligences Inventory. The data gathered via these two instruments were then analyzed and led to the results of this study which unraveled four findings. First, only a small positive correlation existed between EFL learners MIs scores and their vocabulary knowledge. Second, linguistic intelligence, though not significantly was a better predictor for vocabulary knowledge of EFL learners, followed by naturalistic intelligence, existential intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence, and bodily-kinesthetic intelligence respectively. None of the MIs significantly predicted the vocabulary knowledge of EFL learners. Third, concerning vocabulary knowledge of learners, the mean score of male EFL learners was significantly higher than that of female learners. Fourth, the two groups of male and female EFL learners were not significantly different in terms of their multiple intelligence scores.


  1. Gardner H., Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books (1983)
  2. McCarthy M., Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1990)
  3. Folse K.S., Vocabulary myths, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press (2004)
  4. Skourdi S. and Rahimi A., The relationship of emotional intelligence and linguistic intelligence in acquiring vocabulary, California Linguistic Notes, 35(1), 2-24 (2010)
  5. Gardner H., Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books (1999)
  6. Karimi M., Pourdana N. and Sayyedi R. A fresh look at testing vocabulary in EFL context: Predictive power of multiple intelligences. The proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture IPEDR(pp. 124-125), Singapore (2012)
  7. Panahi A., from psychology of intelligence to the pedagogy of multiple-intelligences: Impact of spatial intelligence-based instruction on the vocabulary performance of EFL learners, The Iranian EFL Journal, 8(2), 128-142 (2012)
  8. Javanmard Y., On the relationship between multiple intelligences and their performance on vocabulary tests among Iranian EFL learners, Global Journal of Human Social Science Linguistics and Education,12(12), 60-73 (2012)
  9. Razmjoo A., On the relationship between multiple intelligences and language proficiency, The Reading Matrix, 8(2), 155-174 (2008)
  10. Yan H., Empirical study on relations between gender differences and English vocabulary and the overall proficiency level, Asian Social Science,(5)10, 109-114 (2009)
  11. Wu, Yian, Liu and Runqing E.A., Learner factors and learning achievement: A study of the effect of factors affecting English language learning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press (1996)
  12. Sallabas M.E., Relationship between 8th grade secondary school students reading attitudes and reading comprehension skills, Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(16), 141-155 (2008)
  13. Wei-Wei V., Gender differences in reading comprehension for Chinese secondary school students. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Platteville (2009)
  14. Gebakan D., How students multiple intelligences differ in terms of grade level and gender. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey (2009)
  15. Lin S., Gender and major differences in self-estimates of different aspects of Gardners multiple intelligences: A study of the undergraduate pre-service teachers in Taiwan, Asian Social Science, 5(5), 111-131 (2009)
  16. Furnham A., Fong G. and Martin F., Sex and cross-cultural differences in the estimated multifaceted intelligence quotient score for self, parents and siblings, Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 1025-1034 (1999)
  17. Rammstedt B. and Rammsayer T.H., Sex differences in self-estimates of different aspects of intelligence, Personality and Individual Differences,29, 869-880 (2000)
  18. Ksicinski J.M., Assessment of a remedial community college cohort for multiple intelligences. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED457924 (2000)
  19. Intakhab Alam, kh. Effectiveness of blended learning for teaching of English: An exploratory study, Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 3(3), 78-85 (2014)
  20. Bora A. Science Communication through Mass Media, Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 1(1) 10-15 (2012)
  21. Pooya A., Barfoei H.R., Kargozar N. and Maleki F., Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Conflict Management Strategies, Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 2(7) 37-42 (2013)
  22. Sadia K. and Muhammad Z., Humanitarian Intervention: A New Perspective, Research Journal of Recent Sciences,3(1), 97-102 (2014)
  23. Rasouli Khorshidi H. and Rangasawmy S., Internal/External modifiers in request speech act among Iranian study abroad learners, Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 3(5), 55-64 (2014)