6th International Virtual Congress (IVC-2019) And Workshop.  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Survey Relationship between Organizational Structure and Employees Empowerment in SEMET-CO Company

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Management, Benab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Benab, IRAN
  • 2 Department of Management, Marand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marand, IRAN
  • 3 Department of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, IRAN

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 3, Issue (7), Pages 5-12, July,2 (2014)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between empowerment and organizational structure and the required factors in order to propose an appropriate approach for empowerment of employees. As an approach to identify and evaluate organizational structure, three traits of formality, sophistication and concentration (Robbins theory) is applied as the basis of structure study, and psychological empowerment is employed as evaluation criterion for empowerment. According to earlier researches related to empowerment (particularly Spritzer research work), the psychological empowerment consists of four traits of competence, self-determination, meaningfulness and effectiveness. This study is a survey research and in terms of goal is applicable. The statistical population of this research is all top management and employees of SEMET-CO Company in Iran including 35 individuals. The total statistical population is selected as a sample. To analyze the statistical data, descriptive statistics techniques (including: adjusting descriptive tables, mean, standard deviation) and inferential (analysis of Spearman’s coefficient correlation, analysis of variance, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test) have been used. Regarding the results of research can be noticed that there is a correlation and a positive and significant relationship between the variables of organizational structure and psychological empowerment. Thus, all the hypotheses are confirmed.

References

  1. Roy Y., Chu Sheena J. and Lyenger S., Empowerment through choice? A critical analysis of the effects of choice in organizations, Research in Organizational Behaviors, 12(27), 43-49 (2005)
  2. Dawarri A. and Rezaee H., Personnel's Empowerment, the Journal of Automobile Industry, 9(60) 49-56 (2002)
  3. Andrew N., Peterson A. Zimmerman, Beyond the Individual: Toward a Nomological Network of Organizational Empowerment, American Journal of Community Psychology, 2(34) 129-13 (2004)
  4. Rahman Pour L., Empowerment: concepts, structure and Tactics, Management Development, (2002)
  5. Ma R. Hechanova R.A. Alampay and E.P. France, Psychological Empowerment, Job Satisfaction and Performance among Filipino service workers ,Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(9) 77- 86 (2006)
  6. Mohammadi M., Personnel's Empowerment, Approaches and Processes, A Quarterly of Management Studies, 33(34)175-201 (2001)
  7. Mohammed R. Ahmadk, A Contingency Model for Empowering Customer- contact services, management decision, (1998)
  8. Powell L., Shedding a tier: flattening organizational structures and employee empowerment, The International Journal of Educational Management ,1(16) 54-67 (2002)
  9. Smith J., Personnel's Empowerment, Translated by Saeed Bagherian, Tehran, Khorram Publications, (2002)
  10. Thomas K. and Velthouse B., Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An interpretive Model of Intrinsic task Motivation, Academy of Management Review (1990)
  11. Robbins T.L, Crino M.D, Fredendall L.D, An integrative model of the empowerment process, Human Resource Management Review, (2002)
  12. Romie F. Littrell, Influences on employee preferences for empowerment practices by the ideal manager in Chine, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(88) 45-59 (2007)
  13. Eisenberger R., Huntington R., Hutchison S. and Sowa D., Perceived organizational support, Journal of Applied Psychology, 15(71) 500-507 (1986)
  14. Burke W., Leadership as empowering others. In S. Srivastra (Ed.), Executive power, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (1986)
  15. Block P., The empowered manager. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (1987)
  16. Deci E.L. and Ryan R.M. The General Causality Orientations Scale SelfDetermination in Personality, Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2) 109134 (1985)
  17. Parker L. E., Path Planning and Motion Coordination in Multiple Mobile Robot Teams, in Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science, R. Meyers, Editor-inChief, Springer, (2009)
  18. Speritzer G.M., Psycological empowerment in the work place.Dimensions, Measurement, and validation, Academy of Management Journal, 8(38) 448-462 (1995)
  19. Zimmerman M.A., Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis, in rappaport j, seidman e, Eds, Handbook of community psychology. New york, kluwer academic/plenum publishers, (2004)
  20. Conger J.A. and Kanungo R.N., The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice, Academy of management review, 9(13) 471–482 (1988)
  21. Baker Keltner Denise, An Examination of the Relationship between EmployeeEmpowerment and Organizational Commitment, (2000)
  22. Huff L. and Kelly L., Is collectivism a liability? The impact of culture on organization trust and customer orientation, a seven- nation, Journal of Business Research, 21(58) 96-102 (2005)
  23. Mishra A., Spreitzer D. and Gretchen Marie, Employees' Empowerment, Golden Key of Human Resources Management", translated by Bijan Abdolahi & Abdolrahim Naveh Ebrahim, Published by: Modiran (2006)
  24. Taghizadeh H. Ershadi sis M., Supplier's, Selection in Supply Chain with Combined QFD and ANP Approaches,Research Journal of Recent Sciences 2(6), 66-77 (2013)
  25. Arjmand Kermani R., Survey of the Relation between Organizational Structure and Informational Overload in Case Study: Payame Noor University, Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 2(6), 52-57 (2013)
  26. Droudi H. and Dindar Farkoosh F., an Investigation on the Relation between Human Resources Management and Organizational Developments, Research Journal of Recent Sciences 2(2), 50-53 (2013)
  27. Laxman C. and Sanjeev G.B., Study of Attenuation Coefficient Measurements in Buffalo Milk at Gamma Energy 662 keV, Research Journal of Recent Sciences2(3), 7-13 (2013)
  28. Burns T. and Stalker G.M., The management of innovation. London: Tavistock (1961)
  29. Lynch A.F., TheEmpowerment of Teachers: Overcoming the Crisis of Confidence, The Teachers College Press: New York (1997)
  30. Chandler A., Strategy and Structure, Cambridge, Ma, MIT Press (1960)