International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

A Consideration of Operation Rate of Learning Organization Model (LO Model) of Senge in education system of Iran Case study: Vocational High Schools in Kashan, Iran

Author Affiliations

  • 1University of Isfahan, Tehran, IRAN

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 3, Issue (4), Pages 103-111, April,2 (2014)


The current study considers the operation rate of dimensions of a learning organization – including Personal Mastery, Mental Models, Shared Vision, Team Learning and Systems Thinking – in Vocational High Schools in Kashan. The study is descriptive due to its hypotheses and study objectives. Statistical Population of study includes teachers and administrators (managers and their assistants) of Vocational High Schools in Kashan and sample size of study includes 80 teachers and administrators employed by Ministry of Education. According to analysis of data and other results, no significant relationship was found between demographic characteristics of teachers and administrators, level of education and work experience and the rate of componential operation of learning organization. Among all dimensions of field of study and age groups, only Personal Mastery had a significant relationship, and other dimensions were insignificant. From viewpoint of job position (teacher and administrator), Personal Mastery, Systems Thinking and Team Learning had significant relationship and two other dimensions were not significant.


  1. Majidi, Ardalan, The Best System, Terme Publication,Tehran, 151-155 (2002)
  2. Awasthy Richa, Rajen K. Gupta, Dimensions of the learning organization in an Indian context, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 7(3), 222-244 (2012)
  3. Ghadamgahi, Seyed Mohammad; Ahanchian,Mohammadreza., A Consideration of Schools in Mashad according to Dimensions of a Learning Organization,Journal of Educational Innovation, 14, 132-139 (2005)
  4. Masoudi, Masoomeh, The Effects of Emotional Intelligence on Dimensions of a Learning Organization in University of Isfahan, MA Thesis, University of Isfahan, 23-28 (2011)
  5. Diggins P.B., Reflections on leadership characteristics necessary to develop and sustain learning school communities, School Leadership & Management, 17(2),413-425 (1997)
  6. Gans Bob Fast Learner Organization, Preservation and Durability of Competitive Advantage, translated by: Khodayar Abili; Engineering Design Co. and Vehicle Spare Parts Supply (SAPCO), First edition, 30-34 (1999)
  7. Jafari, Parivash, Mostafa Kalanaki., Relationship between the dimensions of learning organization and readiness-tochange, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5811 – 5815 (2012)
  8. Zhang. Li, Tian. Yezhuang, Zhongying Qi, A., A conceptual model of organizational learning based on knowledge sharing, School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, China 12-16 (2009)
  9. Marquardt, Michael J., Building the Learning Organization:Mastering the 5 Elements for Corporate Learning, Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2end edition, 78-80 (2002)
  10. Tsang, E.W.K., Organizational learning and the learningn organization: a dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research, Human Relations, 50(1) 73-89 (1997)
  11. Swieringa, J. and Wierdsma, A., Becoming a Learning Organization: Beyond the Learning Curve, AddisonWesley,Wokingham, 133-137 (1992)
  12. Kim, D.H., The link between individual and organizational learning, Sloan Management Review, 13(4), 37-50 (1993)
  13. Hawkins, P., Organizational learning: taking stock and facing the challenge, Management Learning, 25(3), 433-61 (1994)
  14. Senge P.M., The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization, New York: Doubleday-Currency,178-183 (1990)
  15. Watkins K.E. and Marsick V.J., Sculpting the learning organization, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 64-66 (1993)
  16. Gephart M.A., Marsick V.J., Van Buren M.E. and Spiro M.S., Learning organizations come alive, Training and Development, 50(12), 34-44 (1996)
  17. Park, joo., Validation of Senge’s Learning Organization Model withTeachers of Vocational High Schools at the Seoul Megalopolis, Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(3), 270-284 (2008)
  18. O’Sullivan F., Learning organizations: Reengineering schools for life long learning. School Leadership & Management, 17(1), 217-230 (1997)
  19. Garavan T., The learning organization :A review and evaluation, The Learning Organization, 4(2), 18-29 (1997)
  20. Isaacon, N., & Bamburg, J., Can school become learning organizations? Educational Leadership, 50(3), 42-44(1992)
  21. Bolman L.G. and Deal T.E., Reframing Organization Artistry, Chioce and Leadership, San Fransisco: Jossy Bas.127-131 (1991)
  22. Fullan M., The New Meaning of Educational Change, New York: Teacher's College Press 33-37 (1991)
  23. Dafoue. R. P., The School as a Learning Organizations:Recommandations for School Improvement, NASSP, 81(588), 81-87 (1997)
  24. Khaki, gholamreza., Research Method, Fuzhan Publication, Tehran, 188-190 (2012)