International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Framework for the Comparison of Classifiers for Medical Image Segmentation with Transform and Moment based features

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Computer Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Wah Cantt., 47040, PAKISTAN

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 2, Issue (6), Pages 1-10, June,2 (2013)


The paper depicts and elaborates a new framework for the comparison of classifiers for medical image segmentation with transform and moment based features. Medical images modalities such as Ultrasound (US) bladder, Ultrasound (US) phantom, Computerized Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) images are segmented using different algorithms namely, k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Grow and learn (GAL) and Incremental Supervised Neural Networks (ISNN). Segmentation is performed by applying feature extraction methods such as 2D Continuous Wavelet Transform (2D-CWT), Moments of gray level histogram (MGH) and a combined version of both 2D-CWT and MGH, called Hybrid features. With different iterations, the analysis results indicate that kNN performs better than GAL, and the performance of GAL is better than that of the ISNN for image segmentation. During analysis a comparison has been drawn between the performance of kNN, GAL and ISNN on the above three feature extraction schemes and also provides the qualitative and quantitative analysis of three classifiers. Results indicate that the performance of 2D-CWT and that of Hybrid features is consistently better than MGH features for all image modalities. The demonstrated frame work or the system is capable to meet the demand for selecting best approach in order to meet the given time constraints and accuracy standards in medical image segmentation.


  1. Zhy C.M., Gu Guo-chang, Liu Hai-bo, Shen Jing and Yu Hualong, Segmentation of Ultrasound Image Based on Texture Feature and Graph Cut, International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, 795-798, 12-14 (2008)
  2. Chi-Man Pun and Hong-Min Zhu, Image Segmentation using Discrete Cosine Texture Feature, International Journal of Computers, 4(1), 19-26 (2010)
  3. Chen Jia-xin and Liu Sen, A medical image segmentation method based on watershed transform, The Fifth International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, 2005, CIT 2005, 634- 638, (2005)
  4. Zhy Chang-ming, Gu Guo-chang, Liu Hai-bo, Shen Jing and Yu Hualong, Segmentation of Ultrasound Image Based on Texture Feature and Graph Cut, International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, 1, 795-798 (2008)
  5. Grau V., Mewes A.U.J., Alcaniz M., Kikinis R. and Warfield S.K., Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23(4), 447-458 (2004)
  6. Waqas Haider, Muhammad Sharif Malik, Mudassar Raza, Abdul Wahab, Izhar Ahmed Khan, Umar Zia, Jawad Tanveer, Hadia Bashir, A Hybrid Method for Edge Continuity based on Pixel Neighbor Pattern Analysis (PNPA) for Remote Sensing Satellite Images, International Journal of Communications, Networks and System Sciences,5( 9A), 624-630 (2012)
  7. Regina Pohle and Klaus D., Toennies, Segmentation of medical images using adaptive region growing, Proceedings of SPIE (Medical Imaging), San Diego; 4322 1337-46 (2001)
  8. Sahoo P.K., Soltani S. and Wong A.K.C., A survey of thresholding techniques, Comput. Vis. Graph. Im. Proc., 41, 233260 (1988)
  9. LIANG Xiao-yun, LUO Li-min and ZENG Wei-ming, Level Set Method Based Medical Image Segmentation (2003)
  10. Middleton and R. Damper, Segmentation of magnetic resonance images using a combination of neural networks and active contour models, Med. Eng.Phys., 26, 71-86 (2004)
  11. Jianzhong Wang, Di Liu, Lili Dou, Baoxue Zhang, Jun Kong and Yinghua Lu, Graph theory based algorithm for magnetic resonance brain images segmentation, 8th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE 2008, 1-5, (2008)
  12. Jain A.K. and Dubes R.C., Algorithms for clustering data, Prentice Hall, (1988)
  13. Lefebvre F., Berger G. and Laugier P., Automatic detection of the boundary of the calcaneus from ultrasound parametric images using an active contour model-clinical assessment, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 17(1) 4552 (1998)
  14. Li H.D., Kallergi M., Clarke L.P., Jain V.K. and Clark R.A., Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography, IEEE T. Med. Imag., 14, 565576 (1995)
  15. McInerney T. and Terzopoulos D., Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey, Med. Im. Anal.,, 91108 (1996)
  16. Bai Peirui, Fu Caihong, Cao Maoyong and Han Yan, Improved Mean Shift Segmentation Scheme for Medical Ultrasound Images, International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE), 1-4, (2010)
  17. Zafer Iscan, Ayhan Yuksel, Zumray Dokur, Mehmet Korurek and Tamer Olmez Medical Image Segmentation with transform and moment based features, Digital Signal Processing, 19(5), 890-901 (2009)
  18. Parkkinen J., Selkainaho K. and Oja E., Detecting texture periodicity from co-occurrence matrix, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 11, 4350 (1990)
  19. Dasarathy B. and Holter E., Image characterization based on joint gray level run length distributions, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 12 497502 (1991)
  20. Wang N. and Lu C., Two-dimensional continuous wavelet analysis and its application to meteorological data, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 27, 652-666 (2010)
  21. Ghazali K.H., Mansor M.F., Mustafa M.M. and Hussain A., Feature Extraction Technique using Discrete Wavelet Transform for Image Classification, 5th Student Conference on Research and Development, 1-4, (2007)
  22. Enhui Zheng, Ping Li and Zhihuan Song, Performance analysis and comparison of neural networks and support vector machines classifier, Intelligent Control and Automation, (2004)
  23. McGunnigle G. and Chantler M.J., Comparison of three rough surface classifiers, Vision, Image and Signal Processing, IEE Proceedings-, 149(5), 263-271 (2002)
  24. Rezaei S., Tavakolian K. and Naziripour K., Comparison of Five Different Classifiers for Classification of Mental Tasks, 27th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 6007-6010, 17-18 (2006)