6th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th May 2021 Due to COVID-19. 10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Improving Barley Yield Grown Under Water Stress Conditions

Author Affiliations

  • 1Agricultural Botany Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, 63514-Fayoum, EGYPT
  • 2 Water Relations and Field Irrigation Dept. National Research Centre, Cairo, 12622 EGYPT

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 1, Issue (6), Pages 1-6, June,2 (2012)


A field experiment was conducted to investigate the influences of paclobutrazol (PBZ) on leaf water potential (ψw), proline content, activities of antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), grain yield and water use efficiency (WUE) of barley ‘cv. Giza 124’ plants subjected to water stress. Plants were treated with two regimes of irrigation water, i.e., 100% of evapotranspiration (ETc) (control) and 60% of ETc and three levels of PBZ solution (0.0 (control), 20 and 40 mg l-1). Leaf water potential, proline content, activities of SOD and CAT, grain yield and WUE were significantly altered by both water stress and PBZ treatments. Results indicated that PBZ (40 mg l-1) mitigated the water stress and significantly reduced the reduction in leaf ψw as compared to non-PBZ-treated water-stressed plants. Water-stressed plants treated with PBZ (40 mg l-1) had significant higher proline content than water-stressed plants without PBZ treatment. Higher antioxidant enzyme activity was also observed in water-stressed plants treated by PBZ than water-stressed plants without PBZ treatments. In comparison to water-stressed plants without PBZ treatment, water-stressed plants treated with PBZ (40 mg l-1) had significant higher SOD and CAT activities. Furthermore, water-stressed plants treated with 40 mg l-1 ofPBZ had also significant higher grain yield and WUE as compared to water-stressed plants without PBZ treatment. The results suggest that PBZ application under water stress conditions alters the equilibrium between free radical production and enzymatic defense reactions in barley by enhancing the proline content and free radical scavenging capacity.


  1. Bohnert H.J. and Jensen R.G., Strategies for engineering water stress tolerance in plants, trends Biotechnol, 14, 89–97 (1996)
  2. Apel K. and Hirt H., Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction, Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 373–399 (2004)
  3. Dat J., Vandenabeele S., Vranova E., Van-Montagu M., Inze D. and Van-Bresegem F., Dual action of active oxygen species during plant stress responses, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 57, 779–795 (2000)
  4. Molassiotis A., Sotiropoulos T., Tanou G., Diamantidis G., Therios I., Boron-induced oxidative damage, antioxidant and nucleolytic responses in shoot tip culture of the apple rootstock EM9 (Malus domestica Borkh), Environ. Exp. Bot., 56, 54–62 (2006)
  5. Asare-Boamah N.K., Hofstra R.A., Fletcher R.A. and Dumbroff E.B., Triadimefon protects bean plants from water stress through its effects on abscisic acid, Plant Cell Physiol. 27, 383–390 (1986)
  6. Wang L.H., Lin C.H., The effect of paclobutrazol on physiological and biochemical changes in the primary roots of pea, J. Exp. Bot., 43, 1367–1372 (1992)
  7. Lin K.H., Pai F.H., Hwang S.Y. and Lo H.F., Pre-treating with paclobutrazol enhanced chilling tolerance of sweet potato, Plant Growth Regul., 49, 249–262 (2006)
  8. Banon S., Ochoa J., Fernandez J.A. and Franco J.A., Paclobutrazol as aids for Phillyrea angustifolia,HortScience, 36, 449–500 (2001)
  9. Berova M. and Zaltev Z., Physiological response of paclobutrazol-treated triticale plants to water stress, Biol. Plant,46, 133–136 (2003)
  10. Zhu L.H., Van-De-Peppel A., Li, X.Y. and Welander M., Changes of leaf water potential and endogenous cytokinins in young apple trees treated with or without paclobutrazol under drought conditions, Sci. Hort, 99, 133–141 (2004)
  11. Upadhyaya A., Davis T., Walser R., Galbraith A. and Sankhla N., Uniconazole-induced alleviation of low temperature damage in relation to antioxidant activity, HortSci., 24, 955–957 (1989)
  12. Kraus T.E. and Fletcher R.A., Paclobutrazol protects wheat seedlings from heat and paraquat injury, Is detoxification of active oxygen involved?, Plant Cell Physiol., 35, 45–52 (1994)
  13. Naor A., Relations between leaf and stem water potentials and stomatal conductance in three field-grown woody species, J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol., 73, 431–436 (1998)
  14. Mackay C., Hall J., Hofstra G. and Fletcher R., Uniconazole-induced changes in abscisic acid, total amino acids and proline in Phaseolus vulgaris,Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 37,74–82 (1990)
  15. Senaratna T., Mackay C., Mckersie B. and Fletcher R., Uniconazole induced chilling tolerance in tomato and its relationship to antioxidant content, J. Plant Physiol. 133, 56–61 (1988)
  16. Fletcher R.A., Hofstra G., In: Berg K. and Plempel M. (Eds.), Triazoles as Potential Plant Protectants, Sterol Biosynthesis Inhibitors: Pharmaceutical and Agrochemical Aspects, Ellis Harwood Ltd., Cambridge, 321–331 (1988)
  17. Gomez K.A. and Gomez A.A., Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 8–29 (1984)
  18. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D. and Smith M., Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56 united Nations–Food and Agricultural Organization, Roma, Italy (1998)
  19. Israelsen O.W. and Hansen V.C., Irrigation Principles and Practices. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons Inco., New York, USA (1962)
  20. Hopkins W.G. and Hüner N.P.A., Introduction to Plant Physiology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., USA, ISBN: 10,0471389153, 576 (2003)
  21. Bates L.S., Waldren R.D., Teare I.D., Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies, Plant Soil, 39, 205–207 (1973)
  22. Fridovich I., Superoxide dismutase, Ann. Rev. Biochem,44, 147–159 (1975)
  23. Luck H., In: Bergmeyer H.U. (Ed.), Methods in Enzymatic Analysis: Catalase Estimation, Academic Press, New York, , 885 (1975)
  24. Jensen M.E., Design and operation of farm irrigation systems, ASAE, Michigan, USA, 827 (1983)
  25. Thomas F.M. and Gausling T., Morphological and physiological responses of oak seedlings (Quercus petraea and Q. robur) to moderate drought, Ann. For. Sci., 57, 325–333 (2000)
  26. Atkinson C.J., Policarpo M., Webster A.D. and Kingswell G., Drought tolerance of clonal Malus determined from measurements of stomatal conductance and leaf water potential, Tree Physiol., 20, 557–563 (2000)
  27. Jaleel C.A., Azooz M.M., Manivannan P. and Panneerselvam R., Involvement of paclobutrazol and ABA on droughtinduced osmoregulation in Cajanus cajan. American-Eurasian, J. Bot., 1(2), 46-52 (2008)
  28. Farooqi A.H.A., Khan A. and Srivastav A.K., Ameliorative effect of paclobutrazol and chlormequat on drought stressed plants of Vetiveria zizanioides,Indian J. Plant Physiol., 15, 1(In Press) (2010)
  29. Smironoff N., The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water decit and desiccation, New Phytol, 125, 27–58 (1993)
  30. Winston G.W., In: Alscher R.G. and Cumming J.R. (Eds.), Stress Responses in Plants, Adaptation and Acclimation Mechanisms: Physiochemical Basis for Free Radical Formation in Cells, Production and Defenses, Wiley Liss, New York, 57–86 (1990)
  31. Larson M.H., Davis T.D. and Evans R.P., Modulation of protein expression in uniconazole treated soybean in relation to heat stress, Proc. Plant Growth Reg. Soc. Am., 15, 177–182 (1988)
  32. Sankhla N., Sankla D. and Upadhyaya A., Amelioration of drought and high temperature injury in fruits of ber by paclobutrazol, Acta Hortic., 239, 197–200 (1997)
  33. Sankar B., Jaleel C.A., Manivannan P., Kishorekumar A., Somasundaram R. and Panneerselvam R., Effect of paclobutrazol on water stress amelioration through antioxidants and free radical scavenging enzymes in Arachis hypogaea L, Colloids and Surf, B: Biointerfaces, 60, 229-235(2007)
  34. Percival G.C. and AlBalushi A.M.S., Paclobutrazol-induced drought tolerance in containerized English and evergreen oak, Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 33, 397-409 (2007)
  35. Somasundaram R., Jaleel C.A., Abraham S.S., Azooz M.M. and Panneerselvam R., Role of paclobutrazol and ABA in drought stress amelioration in Sesamum indicum L, Global J. of Molecular Sci., 4, 2, 56-62 (2009)
  36. Foyer C.H., Descouvieres P. and Kunert K., Protection against oxygen radicals: an important defense mechanism studied in transgenic plants, Plant Cell Environ., 17, 507–523 (1994)
  37. Ogaya R. and Pen˜uelas J., Experimental drought in a holm oak forest: different photosynthetic response of the two dominant species Quercus ilex and Phillyrea latifolia,Environ. Exp. Bot., 50, 137148 (2003)
  38. Turk K. and Hall A., Drought adaptation of cowpea IV, Influence of drought on water use and relations with growth and seed yield, Agron. J., 72, 434–439 (1980)
  39. Liu F., Andersen M.N., Jacobsen S.E. and Jensen C.R., Stomatal control and water use efficiency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during progressive soil drying, Environ. Exp. Bot. 54(1), 33–40 (2004)
  40. Liu F. and Stu¨tzel H., Biomass partitioning, specific leaf area and water use efficiency of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in response to drought stress, Sci. Hort., 102(1), 15–27 (2004)
  41. Fernandez J.A., Balenzategui L., Sanon S. and Franco J.A., Induction of drought tolerance by paclobutrazol and irrigation deficit in Phillyrea angustifolia during the nursery period, Sci. Hort., 107, 277-283 (2006)