6th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th May 2021 Due to COVID-19. 10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Effective Thermal Conductivity of Cucurbit as a Function of Temperature by Thermal Probe Method

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Physics, P.L.J.L. Rastogi Inter College, Moradabad 244 001, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA
  • 2 Department of Botany, K.G.K. College, Moradabad-244001, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA
  • 3 Department of Physics, K G K College, Moradabad 244001, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA

Res. J. Recent Sci., Volume 1, Issue (10), Pages 33-36, October,2 (2012)

Abstract

Effective thermal conductivity of cucurbit was determined at temperatures ranging from 045C. Thermal conductivity was measured by the rapid transient technique using a thermal probe. The probe was inserted in the center of the sample for sufficient time so that the needle maintains temperature equilibrium with the sample and also sample in equilibrium with the surroundings. The temperature distribution generated in the sample was measured through digital micro-voltmeter which measured the voltage generated due to the rise in temperature at the probe situated in the sample. It was found that the effective thermal conductivity of Cucumis sativus (L.) ranged from 0.36 W/mK to 0.56 W/ mK when the temperature varied from 272 K to 298 K, however for Luffa acutangula L.), it is varied from 0.30 W/m K to 0.42 W/m K. It was also observed that near room temperature there was a fall in thermal conductivity with increasing temperature.

References

  1. Van Der Held E.F.M. and Van Drunen F. G., A method of measuring the thermal conductivity of liquids, Physica, 15(10), 865-881 (1949)
  2. Blackwell J.H., The axial-flow error in the thermal-conductivity probe, Canadian Journal of Physics, 34(4), 412-417 (1956)
  3. de Vries D.A. and Peck A.J., On the Cylindrical Probe Method of Measuring Thermal Conductivity with Special Reference to Soils, I. Extension of Theory and Discussion of Probe Characteristics, Australian Journal of Physics,11(2), 255 271 (1958)
  4. Ghuman B.S. and Lal R., Thermal Conductivity, Thermal Diffusivity, and Thermal Capacity of Some Nigerian Soils, Soil Science, 139, 74-80 (1985)
  5. Shah K.K. Tong C.H. and Lund D.B., Methodology to Obtain True Thermal Conductivity of Low Porosity Food Powders, Journal of Food Science, 65(6), 962966 (2000)
  6. Rahman M.S. Chen X.D. and Perera C.O., An improved thermal conductivity prediction model for fruits and vegetables as a function of temperature, water content and porosity, Journal of Food Engineering, 31(2), 163-170, (1997)
  7. Maroulis Z.B. Krokida M.K. and Rahman M.S., A structural generic model to predict the effective thermal conductivity of fruits and vegetables during drying, J. Food Engineering, 52(1), 47-52 (2002)
  8. Carson J.K. Lovatt S.J. Tanner D.J. and Cleland A.C., Predicting the effective thermal conductivity of unfrozen, porous foods, Journal of Food Engineering, 75(3), 297-307(2006)
  9. Turgut A. Tavman I. and Tavman S., Measurement of Thermal Conductivity of Edible Oils Using Transient Hot Wire Method, International J. Food Properties, 12(4), 741-747 (2009)
  10. Incropera F.P. and DeWitt D.P., Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer(4thed), John Wiley & Sons, (1996)