International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Equitable Estates and Management Policy (Analysis of the Benefit and the Primary side, Product marketing Palm oil plantation in Riau Province)

    ,

Author Affiliations

  • 1University of Riau, INDONESIA
  • 2University of Andalas Padang, INDONESIA

Res.J.chem.sci., Volume 5, Issue (6), Pages 73-78, June,18 (2015)

Abstract

The research about the development of equitable estates namely "how the realities of development policy and management aspects of the expediency of plantation and marketing the main production, the production of oil palm plantations on the sideline Riau Province?", has indeed not fair or equitable to plantation companies, State companies and private people's estates (the subject of the estate)?. What are the implications of these policies and how rekonstruksinya?. Using analysis of inequities among others; aspects of marginalization; aspects of monopoly;aspects of domination. The data collected from the relevant documents, the estate of the subject on the existing development pattern 5. The results of research on policy and management plan of the estate there is no provision governing the distribution of primary production and marketing expediency, sideline production and plantation estates subject to all. On the implementation of the policy has memarginalisasikan, monopolize and dominate people's peasant farmers and not the plasma plasma plantations, have implications for the strengthening of marginalization, the existence of a monopoly and dominance of State/private plantation companies, ignoring people's contribution as plasma plantation farmers (partnership), terpentalnya farmers self help from welfare. Reconstruction of a plantation development policy that is equitable; the reduction of the Power of domination; Strengthening economic democracy towards monopoly; strengthening of the rights of a subject/estate against marginalization and; strengthening of the obligations of Government to the prosperity and well-being of people's estates.

References

  1. Soetrisno Loekman, Masalah dan prospek PIR-BUN. Prisma XXVIII, 4, 65-72 (1989)
  2. Arief Sritua, Ekonomi Kerakyatan Indonesia; mengenang Bung Hatta Bapak Ekonomi Kerakyatan Indonesia, Surakarta: UMS, (2002)
  3. Gunawan Rimbo and Juni Thamrin dan Mies Grijns, Dilema Petani Plasma, Pengalaman, PIR-BUN Jawa Barat, Bandung, Akatiga, (1995)
  4. Chotim E. Ermawati, Disharmoni inti-Plasma dalam Pola PIR: Kasus PIR Pangan pada Agroindustri Nanas di Subang, Bandung : Akatiga, (1996)
  5. Fadjar Undang, Perubahan struktur yang belum lengkap dalam kemitraan usaha perkebunan, Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 24(1), 46-60(2006)
  6. Syarfi Ira Wahyuni, Pembangunan Perkebunan Rakyat di Sumatera Barat: (Suatu Kajian dalam perspektif Pembangunan ekonomi Kerakyatan) Disertasi Program Doktor. Ilmu Pertanian, Pemusatan Pembangunan Pertanian, Universitas Andalas Padang, (2007)
  7. Tjondronegoro S.M.P, Sosiologi Agraria: Kumpulan Tulisan terpilih Bandung: Akatiga, (1999)
  8. Goldsmith A, The perspective sektor and rural develovment: Can agribusiness help the small farmer?, World Development, 12(10/11) , 1125-1128 (1985)
  9. Fauzi Noer, Land reform sebagai Variabel Sosial: Perkiraan tentang Rintangan Politik dan Finansial Pelaksanaan Land Reform. Seminar “mengkaji Kembali Land Reform d Indonesia, Jakarta, BPN, Land Law Initiative (LLI) dan Rural Development Institute (RDI), (2002)
  10. Sunarko, Budidaya dan Pengolahan Kebun Kelapa Sawit Dengan Sistem Kemitraan. Jakarta. Agromedia Pustaka, (2009)
  11. Gunawan Wiradi, Pola penguasaan Tanah dan reforma Agraria”, (dalam Sudiono.M.P. Tjondronegoro and dan Gunawan, Wiradi-Eds., Dua Abad penguasaan Tanah, Pola Penguasaan Tanah Pertanian di Jawa dari masa-ke masa), Jakarta: Gramedia untuk Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 291, (1984)
  12. Scott James C Moral Ekonomi Petani, Jakarta, LP3ES, (1983)
  13. Duffy K, Social Exclusion and Human Dignity in Europe, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, (1995)
  14. Dwitho Frasetiandy, Menakar dampak sosial perkebunan sawit, http://www.walhikalsel.org/content/view/ 131/48/ [Diakses 2013/2/07], (2009)
  15. Soesastro Hadi, Microeconomic Policy Reform : Strategy for Regional Cooperation, EABER Working Papers 21856, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research,(2007)
  16. Graham E, Dan I. Floering, The modern plantation in the third world, London: Croom Helm, (1984)
  17. Kartasasmita Ginanjar Dkk, Perubahan dan Pembangunan, Ikatan Alumni ITB, (2005)
  18. Fadjar Undang, Pengembangan Pola Kemitraan Agribisnis Perkebunan: Studi Perbandingan pada Petani Karet PIR-BUN-UPP dan Non Proyek, Prosiding Lokakarya Kemitraan Pertanian, Bogor: APPI, (2000)
  19. Rawls Jhon, A Theory of Justice, London: Oxford University press, 1973, yang sudah diterjemahkan dalam bahasa Indonesia oleh Uzair Fauzan dan Heru Prasetyo, Teori Keadilan, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar, (2006)
  20. Dillon H.S, Keadilan Prasyarat Kelestarian, Jakarta: Jurnal Nasional,(2013)
  21. Pangabean Godlim, Perkebunan, Masa Lalu, Masa Kini, dan Masa Datang. Tabloid Sinar Tani. Edisi 22- 28 Desember 2011 No. 3385 Tahun XLI, (2011)