9th International Science Congress (ISC-2019).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Reading as an interactive process: collaborative and psycholinguistic interactions for reading literature in the EFL classroom

Author Affiliations

  • 1University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom, Teaching staff member in the Department of English, Benghazi University, Libya

Res. J. Language and Literature Sci., Volume 6, Issue (3), Pages 16-26, September,19 (2019)

Abstract

The main purpose of the present article is to situate the process of reading English literature in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts within a perspective that integrates psycholinguistic and social constructivist views of language learning. Findings of second language acquisition (SLA) research in the past 20 years provided major accomplishments in the field. However, sociocultural perspectives were recently addressed as more effective. More specifically, this article views reading of literature in the EFL contexts as a process situated within the two contradictory fields: i. The positivist ontological view of psycholinguistic era that focuses the effect of the individual mind in learning. ii. The interpretivist paradigm of social constructivism that imposes the role of interaction and dialogic exchanges for learning. Accordingly, the article is organized in two parts. The first part manifests the views and issues of psycholinguistic era followed by the arrival of social constructivism in SLA. More specifically, the tension of the two debates is discussed followed by a complementary view of the two eras.

References

  1. Pardo L.S. (2004)., What every teacher needs to know about comprehension., The Reading Teacher, 58(3), 272-280.
  2. Nassaji H. (2003)., Higher–Level and Lower–Level text processing skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension., The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 261-276.
  3. Carrell P.L. (1987)., Content and formal schemata in ESL reading., TESOL Quarterly, 21(3), 461-481.
  4. DeKeyser R. and Juffs A. (2005)., Cognitive considerations in L2 learning., In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Routledge, 461-478.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781135636463/chapters/10.4324/9781410612700-3610/06/2017.
  5. Alexander P.A. and Fox E. (2004)., A historical perspective on reading research and practice., Theoretical models and processes of reading, 5, 33-68. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.472.2859&rep=rep1&type=pdf 20/12/2018.
  6. Hedge T. (2001)., Teaching and learning in the language classroom., Oxford, England: Oxford university press, 106, 1-464. ISBN-13: 978-0194421720.
  7. LaBerge D. and Samuels S.J. (1974)., Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading., Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.
  8. Carrell P.L., Devine J. and Eskey D.E. (1988)., Interactive approaches to second language reading., Cambridge University Press., 1-304. ISBN-13: 978-0521358743
  9. Charles Alderson (2000)., Assessing reading., Cambridge university press, England, 1-371. ISBN 052159000 0.
  10. Carrell P.L. and Eisterhold J.C. (1983)., Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy., TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.
  11. Smith F. (1972)., Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read., American Educational Research, 1(9), 165-168.
  12. Ajideh P. (2003)., Schema theory-based pre-reading tasks: A neglected essential in the ESL reading class., Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 3(1), 1-14.
  13. Anderson R.C., Reynolds R.E., Schallert D.L. and Goetz E.T. (1977)., Frameworks for comprehending discourse., American educational research journal, 14(4), 367-381.
  14. Kenneth Goodman (1975)., The reading process., Cambridge university press, England, 1-304. ISBN-13: 978-0521358743.
  15. Kenneth Goodman (1968)., The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process., Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 1-274. ASIN: B0006BRKBK.
  16. Kenneth Goodman (1971.)., Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-206. ISBN-13: 978-0521082365
  17. Goodman K. (1967)., Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game., Literacy Research and Instruction, 6(4), 126-135.
  18. Goldman S.R., Golden R. and van den Broek P. (2007)., Why are computational models of text comprehension useful., Higher-level language processes in the brain, 27-51.http://www.utd.edu/~golden/arcade/GoldmanGoldenVanDenBroek.pdf, 25/11/2018.
  19. Rumelhart D. (2018)., Toward an interactive model of reading., https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3-euw1-ap-pe-ws4-cws-documents.ri prod/9781138087279/29_ Rumelhart%2C_Toward_an_Interactive_Model_of_Reading.pdf 10/05/2018.
  20. Nassaji H. (2002)., Schema theory and Knowledge‐Based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives., Language Learning, 52(2), 439-481.
  21. Alptekin C. (2006)., Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading., System, 34(4), 494-508.
  22. Anderson N.J. (1999)., Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies., Heinle & Heinle., Boston, 1-144. ISBN 0-8384-6685-0.
  23. Grabe W.P. and Stoller F.L. (2002)., Teaching and researching reading., Reading in a foreign language, 14(2), 155-157.
  24. Johnson P. (1981)., Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of a text., TESOL Quarterly, 15(2), 169-181.
  25. Ketchum E.M. (2006)., The cultural baggage of second language reading: An approach to understanding the practices and perspectives of a non-native product., Foreign Language Annals, 39(1), 22-42.
  26. McKay S. (1987)., Cultural knowledge and the teaching of reading., In English Teaching Forum, 25(2), 18-20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ838389 20/11/2018.
  27. An S. (2013)., Schema theory in reading., Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 130-134.
  28. Grabe W. (1988)., Reassessing the term “interactive’’., Annual review of applied linguistics, 10, 145-162.
  29. Nancie Atwell (1998)., In the Middle: New Understandings about Writing, Reading, and Learning., National Council of Teachers of English, Boynton. ISBN0-86709-374-9, 1-546.
  30. Semino E. (1995)., Schema and the analysis of text worlds in poetry., Language and literature, 4(2), 79-108.
  31. Wilcox C. and Williams L. (1990)., Taking stock of schema theory., The social science journal, 27(4), 373-393.
  32. Gathercole S. and Alloway T. (2019)., Understanding working memory: A classroom guide., https://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WM-classroom -guide.pdf. 01/01/2019.
  33. Numminen H. (2002)., Working memory in adults with intellectual disability., Research in Development disabilities, 23(2), 105-118.
  34. Erten I.H. and Razi S. (2009)., The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension., Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 60-77.
  35. Oller J.W. (1995)., Adding abstract to formal and content schemata: Results of recent work in Peircean semiotics., Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 273-306.
  36. Guy Cook (1995)., Discourse and literature., Oxford university press, England, 1-285. ISBN0194371859.
  37. Weber J.J. (1992)., Critical analysis of fiction: essays in discourse stylistics., 85, Rodopi. https://books.google.com.ly/books?hl=en&lr=&id=aIyKKRghunMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Weber,+J.+J.+(1992).+Critical+analysis+of+fiction:+Essays+in+discourse+stylistics.+Rodopi.&ots=AApLxAzn7_&sig=Nv-JmCcnld-Y3M59Nq-iH1oYLPk&redir_esc=y
  38. Picken J. (2007)., Literature, metaphor and the foreign language learner., Springer. ISBN 10: 1349353262, 1-174.
  39. Henry Widdowson (1975)., Stylistics and the teaching of literature., Longman, London.ISBN0 582 5507, Pp1-140.
  40. Richards J., Platt J., Weber H. and Inman P. (1986)., Longman dictionary of applied linguistics., RELC Journal, 17(2), 105-110.
  41. Widdowson H.G. (1974)., Literary and scientific uses of English., ELT Journal, 28(4), 282-292.
  42. Mooij Jan (1976)., A study of metaphor: On the nature of metaphorical expressions, with special reference to their reference, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam., ISBN: 0720462096, pp1-190.
  43. Pleydell-Pearce A. (1967)., Sense, reference and fiction., The British Journal of Aesthetics, 7(3), 225-236.
  44. Lee J.F. and Musumeci D. (1988)., On hierarchies of reading skills and text types., The Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 173-187.
  45. Michael Byram M. and Philip Fleming (1998)., Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography., Cambridge University Press, England.ISBN-10: 0521625599, 1 1-320.
  46. Pearson P.D. (2019)., Direct explicit teaching of reading comprehension., https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/ handle/2142/17914/ctrstreadtechrepv01988i00427_opt.pdf?sequence 08/04/2019.
  47. Thorndyke P.W. and Yekovich F.R. (1980)., A critique of schema-based theories of human story memory., Poetics, 9(1-3), 23-49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/abs/pii/0304422X8090011X
  48. Zuengler J. and Miller E.R. (2006)., Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds?., Tesol Quarterly, 40(1), 35-58.
  49. Firth A. and Wagner J. (1997)., On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research., The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285-300.
  50. Claire Kramsch (2002)., From Practice to Theory and Back Again., Taylor & Francis. ISSN: 0790-8318, 1-320.
  51. Kasper G. (1997)., A stands for acquisition: A response to Firth and Wagner., The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 307-312.
  52. Gee J.P. (2001)., Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective., Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(8), 714-725.
  53. Glenberg A.M. (1997)., What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action., Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 20(01), 1-19.
  54. Yakovleva N.O. and Yakovlev E.V. (2014)., Interactive teaching methods in contemporary higher education., Pacific Science Review, 16(2), 75-80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1229545014000175.
  55. Anna Chamot, Sara Barnhardt, Pamela El-Dinary and Jill Robbins (1999)., The learning strategies handbook., Longman: New York. ISBN-10: 020138548, 1-249.
  56. Rubin J. (2001)., Language learner self-management., Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 11(1), 25-37.
  57. Wang Yu-Chun (2014)., Using wikis to facilitate interaction and collaboration among EFL learners: A social constructivist approach to language teaching., System, 42, 383-390.
  58. Palincsar A.S. (1998)., Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning., Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375.
  59. Harry Daniel (2001)., Vygotsky and pedagogy., Routledge Falmer, New York. ISBN10: 041523767X, 1-208.
  60. Anton M. (1999)., The discourse of a learner-centred classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second-language classroom., Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 303-318.
  61. Jones M.G. and Brader-Araje L. (2002)., The impact of constructivism on education: Language, discourse, and meaning., American Communication Journal, 5(3), 1-10.
  62. Gunduz N. and Hursen C. (2017)., Constructivism in Teaching and Learning; Content Analysis Evaluation., https://cyberleninka.org/article/n/873599. 13/8/2017
  63. Leo Van Lier (2014)., Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity, Routledge., Unied Kingdom. ISBN-10: 0582248795, 1-260.
  64. Tobin K. and Tippins D. (1993)., Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning., The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, 1, 3-22.
  65. Davis R., Maher C. and Noddings N. (1990)., Constructivist views on the learning and teaching of mathematics., Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4, 1-3.
  66. Matusov E. and Hayes R. (2000)., Sociocultural critique of Piaget and Vygotsky., New Ideas in Psychology, 18(2), 215-239.
  67. Von Glasersfeld E. (2018)., An interpretation of Piaget’s constructivism., 36(4), 1-18. http://www.vonglasersfeld .com/077 10/10/2018.
  68. Lantolf J.P. and Appel G. (1994)., Vygotskian approaches to second language research., Greenwood Publishing Group., United States. ISBN-10: 1567500250, pp1-220.
  69. Vygotsky L.S. (1979)., Consciousness as a Problem in the Psychology of Behavior., Soviet Psychology, 17(4), 3-35. DOI: 10.2753/RPO1061-040517043.
  70. Lantolf J. and Pavlenko A. (1995)., Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition., Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 108-124.
  71. Jan Valsiner (1993)., Culture and human development: A constructivist perspective., Plenmuq, New York. ISBN-10: 0306413272, 1-326.
  72. Pressley M., Harris K.R. and Marks M.B. (1992)., But good strategy instructors are constructivists!., Educational Psychology Review, 4(1), 3-31.
  73. Lantolf James (2000)., Sociocultural theory and second language learning., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-296. ISBN-10: 0194421600.
  74. Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky (1978)., Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes., Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1-159. ISBN-10: 0674576292.
  75. Marion Williams and Robert Burden (2004)., Psychology for language teachers, Cambridge university press., Cambridge, 1-252ISBN-10: 0521498805.
  76. Rosamond Mitchell, Florence Myles and Emma Marsden (2013)., Second language learning theories., Routledge, England, 1-400. ISBN-10: 1444163108.
  77. Lantolf J.P. and Pavlenko A. (1995)., Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition., Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 108-124.
  78. Newman D., Griffin P. and Cole M. (1989)., The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school., Cambridge University Press., England, 1-167. ISBN - 0521389429.
  79. Lantolf J. and Aljaafreh A. (1995)., Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience., International Journal of Educational Research, 23(7), 619-632.
  80. Wood D., Bruner J.S. and Ross G. (1976)., The role of tutoring in problem solving., Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
  81. Bill Van Patten and Jasica Williams (2009)., Theories in second language acquisition., 1-272. ISBN-10: 0805857389.
  82. Bruner J. (1985)., Child’s talk: Learning to use language., Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 1(1), 111-114.
  83. De Guerrero M.C. and Villamil O.S. (2000)., Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision., The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51-68.
  84. Damon W. (1984)., Peer education: The untapped potential., Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5(4), 331-343.
  85. Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky (1962)., Thought and language, MIT Press: Cambridge., 1-344. ISBN-10: 9780262720106.
  86. Duff P.A. (1995)., An ethnography of communication in immersion classrooms in Hungary., Tesol Quarterly, 29(3), 505-537.
  87. Harklau L. (1994)., ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments., TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 241-272.
  88. Lantolf J.P. (1996)., SLA theory building:“Letting all the flowers bloom!”., Language learning, 46(4), 713-749.
  89. Wenger E. (2016)., Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity., http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ CBO978051180393215/5/2016.
  90. Donato R. and McCormick D. (1994)., A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation., The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 453-464.
  91. Larsen-Freeman D. (2002)., Language acquisition and language use from a chaos., Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives, 33. https://books.google.com.ly/books?hl=en&lr=&id=eotvNL4x7t0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA33&dq=Larsen
  92. David Block (2003)., The social turn in second language acquisition., ERIC, United States,pp-124.ISBN-10: 087840144X.
  93. Lantolf James (2005)., Sociocultural and second language learning research: An exegesis., Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 1-1168. ISBN- 13: 978-0805841817.
  94. Young R and Collin A. (2004)., Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field., Journal of vocational behaviour, 64(3), 373-388.
  95. Jacobson E., Degener S. and Purcell-Gates V. (2003)., Creating Authentic Materials and Activities for the Adult Literacy Classroom: A Handbook for Practitioners., http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/teach/jacobson.pdf10/10/2018.
  96. Mooney M. and Nolan L. (2006)., A critique of Freire’s perspective on critical social theory in nursing education., Nurse Education Today, 26(3), 240-244. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026069170500184X. 15/11/2018.
  97. Perry K. (2012)., What is Literacy? – A Critical Overview of Sociocultural Perspectives., Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8(1), 50-71.