International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Comparative analysis of profits of paddy cultivation under owner - cultivated land and tenant-cultivated land

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Economics, Faculty of Commerce and Management, Eastern University, Sri Lanka
  • 2University of Colombo, Sri Lanka

Int. Res. J. Social Sci., Volume 7, Issue (6), Pages 1-10, June,14 (2018)


The economy of Batticaloa district depends mostly on agriculture and fishing for livelihood. In Batticaloa district farmers use approximately 61,321 hectares of paddy land in out of total land to cultivate paddy seed. Nevertheless, not all of them own paddy land for cultivation. Hence farmers, who encounter the shortage of paddy land, have to rely upon tenancy givers to access paddy land. Even though, in Batticaloa district, most of the tenancy agreements do not have a form of written contact and associate mostly with verbal agreements without any legal evidence. Thus, in the prevailing situations, farmers who have been engaging in either owner-cultivated land or tenant-cultivated land. In this circumstantial, there may be distinction in profit earning of paddy cultivation among both owner- cultivated land tenant- cultivated land. The main objective of this study is to examine the difference of profit between tenant – cultivated land and owner- cultivated land. The study is based on primary data, which was gathered during the 2015/16 paddy Maha season by a structured questionnaire. The study utilize four hundred sample of farmers were selected using both snow ball sampling and random sampling technique. To investigate the objective, OLS regression analysis was employed using Cobb Douglas production function. The results expose that, profit of paddy on tenant-cultivated land was not less compare to owner-cultivated land as well as there was no significance difference between owner-cultivated land and tenant-cultivated land in term of profit as there was a slight difference between tenant-cultivated land and owner- cultivated land in term of profit. Nonetheless, the study found that owner cultivated land is slightly higher in input use as well as cost of inputs also higher than tenant- cultivated land.


  1. Gamawelagedara W.C., Wickramasinghe Y.M. and Dissanayake C.A.K. (2011)., Impact of rice processing villages on house hold income of rural farmers in Anuradhapura District., Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(2), 92-99.
  2. Ministry of Agriculture Development and agrarian services. (2008-2010). Colombo: Ministry of Agriculture Development and agrarian services., undefined, undefined
  3. Department of Agriculture (2015). Batticaloa., undefined, undefined
  4. District Secretariat (2015). Batticaloa., undefined, undefined
  5. Sharma V.P. and Thaker H. (2010)., Fertiliser subsidy in India: Who are the beneficiaries?., Economic and Political weekly, 68-76.
  6. Rahman A.A. and Othman P.F. (2012)., The Agricultural Land Tenancy Contract from the Islamic Perspective and its Practice amoung Farmers: A Study in Selangor, Malaysia., African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(10), 1584-1594.
  7. Indraratna A.D.V.De.S. (2008)., Development issues and concerns., A.D.V.De. S Indraratna Felicitation Committee.
  8. Chandrasiri J.K.M.D. (2010)., Impact of Informal Land Transactions in Settlement Schemes in Sri Lanka., Hector Kobbekaduwa Agrarian Research and Training Institute, Research Report No.132, 1-69.
  9. Ubink J. and Quan J. (2008)., How to combine tradition and modernity? Regulating customary land management in Ghana., Based on Land Use Policy, 25(2), 198-213. doi: 10.1016/j.landuse.pol.2007.06.002.
  10. Donkor E. and Owusu V. (2014)., Effects of land tenure systems on resource-use productivity and efficiency in Ghana’s rice industry., African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 9(4), 286-299.
  11. Oladele O.I., Kolawole A. and Wakatsuki T. (2011)., Land tenure, investment and adoption of Sawah rice production technology in Nigeria and Ghana: A qualitative approach., African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(6), 1519-1524.
  12. Pender J. and Fafchamps M. (2002)., Land Lease Markets and Agricultural Efficiency: Theory and Evidence from Ethiopia., CSAEWPS-19, 1-51.
  13. Rakhshanda K. and Awudu A. (2014)., Impact of non-farm work and land tenancy contracts on soil conservation measures., Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, 1-20.
  14. Ben-Chendo G.N. and Joseph V.N. (2014)., Comparative Analysis of Rice Productivity of Farmers on Different Land Tenure Systems in Imo State., International Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Research, 2(3), 24-32.
  15. Chi P.V.Q. and Fujimoto A. (2012)., Land tenure and tenancy conditions in relation to rice production in three villages in the Red River Delta, Vietnam., Jurnal ISSAAS.[Internet].[21 November 2017], 18(1), 31-48.
  16. Deshpande R.S. (2003)., Current land policy issues in India, Land Reform., Special Edition, FAO publications.
  17. Prakash S., Patil S., Konda C.R., Amrutha T.J. and Siddayya S. (2013)., Input use and production pattern of paddy cultivation under leased in land in Tungabhadra project area Karnataka., Journal of Agricultural Scence, 26(2), 224-228.
  18. Lakshmi P.P.A., Sant K. and Aruna S. (2009)., Rice Production in India – Implications of Land Inequity and Market Imperfections., Agricultural Economics Research Review, (Conference Number), 22, 431-442.
  19. Aung N.M. (2012)., Production and economic efficiency of farmers and millers in Myanmar rice industry., Institute of developing economies japan external trade organization.
  20. Deuiinger K. and jin S. (2002)., Land Rental Markets as an Alternative to Government Reallocation?., Equity and Efficiency Considerations in the Chinese Land Tenure System. Policy Research Working Paper no 293, The World Bank Development Research Group, 1-39.
  21. Tseng H. (2002)., Land Ownership Transfer and Productivity: Evidence from Taiwan., Asia Conference on Efficiency and Productivity Growth, 1- 47.
  22. Bardhan P. and Mookherjee D. (2007)., Land Reform and Farm Productivity in West Bengal., Stanford Center for International Development, 1-58.