International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Dependency theory and its analyzes in the context of Pakistan

    ,

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Criminology, University of Karachi, Pakistan
  • 2Department of Criminology, University of Karachi, Pakistan

Int. Res. J. Social Sci., Volume 6, Issue (6), Pages 25-31, June,14 (2017)

Abstract

Dependency theory is largely an economic and social developmental model that explains the inequality throughout on the global spectrum through the primitive maneuvering of poor societies in the hand of rich societies. However, there are various factors that Pakistan is dependent upon the core countries. But the main factors in which Pakistan depends upon the core countries are: inherent enforcement, global marketing, economic growth dependency, cultural, religious and population control policies and as well as academic. So, the researchers used content analysis based upon the existing literature available. Thus, being one of the colonized nations it inherited all its manuals and procedures for its route heading toward the future from the Imperial British, and being mentally so dependent the rulers and planners that they remained absolutely incapable to evolve the way to go ahead in getting mental and psychological freedom from their masters. And the concluding remark that the inherent enforcement, global marketing, economic growth dependency, cultural, religious and population control policies and as well as academically Pakistan is dependent over the rich countries.

References

  1. Macionis J. (2012)., Sociology., Ankara: Nobel Publishing, New York, America: Pearson Education, Inc.
  2. ATES H., ES M. and Bayraktar Y. (2005)., Dependency Theory: Still an appropriate tool for understanding the political economy of the middle east., Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 19(2), 247-262.
  3. Gardezi H.N. (1991)., Understanding Pakistan: The Colonial Factor in Societal Development., Lahore: Maktaba Fikro-Danish.
  4. Grier B. (1981)., Underdevelopment, Modes of Production, and the State in Colonial Ghana., African Studies Review, 24(1), 21-47.
  5. Carter A. (1995)., The Nation-State and Underdevelopment., Third World Quarterly, 16(4), 595-618.
  6. UDOKA I.A. (2005)., History And The Challenge Of Underdevelopment In The 21St Century Africa., Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria, 16(2), 72-80.
  7. Reyes Giovanni E. (2001)., Four Main Theories of Development: Modernization, Dependency, Word-System, and Globalization., Nomadas: Critical Review of Social and Juridical Sciences, Julio-Diciembre.
  8. David R.S. (1980)., Philippine Underdevelopment And Dependency Theory., Philippine Sociological Review, 28(1/4), 81-87.
  9. Haque Z. and Gardezi H.N. (1991)., Understanding Pakistan: The Colonial Factor in Societal Development., The Pakistan Development Review, 30(2), 207-212.
  10. Sunkel Osvaldo (1969)., National Development Policy and External Dependence in Latin America., The Journal of Development Studies, 6(1), 23-48.
  11. Ferraro Vincent (1996)., Dependency Theory: An Introduction, July 1996., .
  12. Beigel Fernanda (2010)., Dependency Analysis: The Creation of New Social Theory in Latin America., Http://www.jornaldomauss.org/. The International Handbook on Diverse Sociological Traditions, London, 189-200. .
  13. Bodenheimer S. (1970)., Dependency and Imperialism: The Roots of Latin American Underdevelopment., NACLA Newsletter, 4(3), 18-27.
  14. Leys C. (1977)., Underdevelopment and Dependency: Critical Notes., Journal of Contemporary Asia, 7(1), 92-107.
  15. Gardezi H.N. (1991)., Understanding Pakistan: The Colonial Factor in Societal Development., Maktaba Fikro-Danish
  16. Saif Lubna (1991)., Neo-Colonial States and Economic Development: Comparative Analysis of underdevelopment in Pakistan and India., Pakistan Vision, 9(1), 19-45.