International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Watershed development programmes: an evaluation and its impact in India

Author Affiliations

  • 1JAU, Junagadh, India
  • 2JAU, Junagadh, India
  • 3JAU, Junagadh, India

Int. Res. J. Social Sci., Volume 6, Issue (2), Pages 5-17, February,14 (2017)

Abstract

The study is concerned with the watershed development programme evaluation and their impact in India. The study examines the evaluation and the affect of WDPs on various field activities across different states in India. In the present study the total method has been used for watershed programme evaluation. It has been seen that in most of the regions the land use pattern was increased and there was a net raise in the irrigation sources due to increase in the deep drainage or deep drainage through water disambiguation. In comparision with the methods for assessment of impact of watershed programmes, the economic surplus method showed a positive effect and this method seems to have more advantage compared to other methods. It has been concluded that the more wasteland was converted for efficient use by the farmers and the better utilization of land has helped the farmers to increase the intensification of agriculture and thus improve the agricultural production. For the success of the programme the community participation should be effective and it results in better employment opportunities to the people.

References

  1. Kerr John, Pangare Ganesh, Pangare V.L. and George P.J. (2000)., An evaluation of dryland watershed development projects in India., EPTD discussion paper, 68, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington. D. C.
  2. Rao C.H.H. (2000)., Watershed development in India: Recent experience and emerging Issues., Economic and Political Weekly, 35(45), 3943-3947.
  3. Palanisami K. and Kumar Suresh D. (2006)., Challenges in impact assessment of watershed development: Methodological issues and experiences., New Delhi: Associated Publishing Company Ltd.
  4. Moore Michael R., Gollehon Noel R. and Hellerstein Daniel M. (2000)., Estimating producerís surplus with the censored regression model: An application to producers affected by Columbia River Basin Salmon Recovery., Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 25(2), 325-346.
  5. Maredia Mywish, Byerlee Derek and Anderson Jock (2000)., Ex-post evaluation of economic impacts of agricultural research programmes: A tour of good practice., 1-40.
  6. Palanisami K. and Suresh kumar D. (2006)., Challenges in impact assessment of watershed development. In: Imapct Assessment of Watershed Development: Methodological Issues and Experiences., New Delhi: Associated Publishing Company Ltd.
  7. Palanisami K. and Suresh Kumar D. (2007)., Watershed development and augmentation of groundwater resources: Evidence from Southern India., Third International Groundwater Conference Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
  8. Shiferaw Bekele and Ade Freeman (2003)., Methods for Assessing the Impacts of Natural Management Research., International Crop Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics, Hyderabad.
  9. Palanisami K., Suresh Kumar D. and Ndumaran (2011)., Methodology in evaluation of watershed programmes., Methodological issues in assessing impact of watershed programmes. National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi.20.
  10. Singh Prem, Behera H.C. and Singh Aradhana (2010)., Impact and effectiveness of the watershed development programmes in India., Mussorrie India Centre Rural Stud, 29, 1-55.
  11. Palanisami K., Suresh Kumar D. and Ndumaran (2011)., Methodology in evaluation of watershed programmes. In: Methodological issues in assessing impact of watershed programmes., National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi, 20.
  12. Mondal B., Alka Singh and Girish Kumar Jha (2012)., Impact of watershed development programmes on farm-specific technical efficiency: A study in bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh., Agricultural Economics Research Review, 25(2), 299-308.
  13. Joshi P.K., Tewari A.K., Jha and Shiyani R.L. (2000)., Meta analysis to assess the impact of watershed., National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi.
  14. Shaheen F.A., Joshi P.K. and Wani S.P. (2008)., Watershed Development in North-East: Problems and opportunities., International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Hyderabad. 2-4.
  15. Chandru P., Basavaraj D. and Nagappa D. (2015)., Impact assessment study of a watershed development programme in terms of irrigation sources, groundwater recharge and crop productivity in a micro-watershed, Karnataka., Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28(1), 75-78.
  16. Pathak P., Anil Kumar C., Suhas P. Wani and Raghavendra S. (2013)., Multiple impact of integrated watershed management in low rainfall Semi-Arid region: A case study from Eastern Rajasthan, India., Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 27-36.