6th International Virtual Congress (IVC-2019) And Workshop.  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Land Reform in the South African sugar industry: The Quest for Reconstruction, Development and Equity

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Agricultural Economics, Education and Extension, Botswana College of Agriculture, Botswana

Int. Res. J. Social Sci., Volume 5, Issue (3), Pages 9-18, March,14 (2016)

Abstract

Land reform in South Africa (SA) is a broad policy initiative which is implemented under the auspices of the Reconstruction Development Program (RDP) in South Africa. In pursuit of equity, inclusive growth and economic development, the ANC government has to date, through the land redistribution program enabled some PDIs to own land and engage in mainstream commercial agriculture. The introduction of black farmers into the SA sugar industry has reshaped entry paths into the industry. Integration of new entrant farmers into the sugar industry has also lead to increased demand for extension and other post-settlement services. This paper (i) highlights the benefits of land reform in SA, (ii) reports on the respondents’ demographics and entry paths into the SA sugar industry in KZN by the emerging black growers and (iii) suggest some policy implications. The surveyed NFGs were mostly male and relatively old and, had no educational background in either agriculture or/any business related field. Relatively few surveyed growers had prior experience in managing sugarcane farms, hence the majority were in the rare entry path. Growers identified mentorship and extension as important sources of skills for agronomic or technical aspects of sugarcane production. Consequently, mentorship should not be used to replace extension, but should rather complement it. Policy makers therefore, need to craft and implement post-settlement support services customized to meet the needs of growers from diverse backgrounds. Further, there is need to do detailed grower needs analysis and profile them according to their backgrounds, training and development needs in order to optimize the intended benefits of support services and land reform sustainability.

References

  1. Armstrong D. (2004)., Financing, Viability and Costs Associated with Transferring Sugarcane Land to Previously Disadvantaged Individuals., Proceedings of 78th South African Sugar Technologists’ Association Conferences. Durban, South Africa, 27-30.
  2. Thomson D.N. and Bates R.F. (2005)., Creating an Environment for Success by Land Redistribution: Some Challenges for the Sugar Industry., Proceedings of 79th South African Sugar Technologists’ Association Conference. Durban, South Africa, 19-22.
  3. Thomson R. and Gillit C. (2007)., The Land Reform Process in South Africa with Emphasis on Land Restitution., Proceedings of the 16th International Farm Management Association Congress, Cork, Ireland, 15-20.
  4. Lahiff E. (2008)., Land Reform in South Africa: A Status Report 2008. Cape Town: Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS)., University of Western Cape, Research Report No. 38.
  5. Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (DRDLR). (2012)., Midterm Review of the Department of Rural Department and Land Reform., Pretoria, South Africa.
  6. Mokhatla P.Z Nell W.T. and Wilhem T. (2005)., Strategies for Successfully Settling Farmers in South Africa., Proceedings of the 15th International Farm Management Association Congress, Campinas SP, Brazil, 14-19 August.
  7. Department of Land Affairs (DLA) (2008)., The Land and Agrarian Reform Project: The Concept Document., Version 5. Pretoria: South Africa.
  8. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Affairs (MALA). (2005)., Land and Agrarian Reform in South Africa: An Overview in Preparation for the Land Summit., 27 – 31 July, Version 5. Pretoria: South Africa.
  9. Reeve I. and Stayner R. (2006)., Preparing Entrants to Farming: Scoping Programs and Strategies., RIRDC Publication No. 06/041. Project No. UNE-81A.
  10. Anseeuw W. and Laurent C. (2007)., Occupational Paths Towards Commercial Agriculture: The key Roles of Farm Pluriactivity and Commons., Journal of Arid Environments, 70, 659–671.
  11. Fuller A.M. (Eds). (1990). Pluriactiviity and rural change in Western Europe. Journal of Rural Studies, Special Issue on Pluriactiviity 6(4), 355–457., undefined, undefined
  12. South African Canegrowers Association (SACGA). (2010)., Retrieved March 15, 2010 from, http://www.sacanegrowers.co.za.
  13. Pilusa T. Personal Communication (2013)., Research Economist. South African Canegrowers Association., Durban, South Africa.
  14. South African Canegrowers Association (SACGA). (2008)., South African Canegrowers 2007/08 Annual Report., Durban, South Africa.
  15. Kwa Zulu-Natal (2009), Department of Agriculture and Environmental Affairs (KZNDAEA)., Mentorship Policy., Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
  16. Street K. and Kleynhans T.E. (1996)., A Formal Mentorship Programme for Emerging Farmers in the Western Cape., SA Journal of Agricultural Extension, 29(25), 39-57.