International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Judicial Activism for Environment Protection in India

Author Affiliations

  • 1Graduate School of Social Sciences, Waseda University, Tokyo, JAPAN

Int. Res. J. Social Sci., Volume 4, Issue (4), Pages 7-14, April,14 (2015)

Abstract

The environment protection was a least priority in India’s post-independence era due to need of industrialization and political disturbances. However, the Bhopal Gas tragedy acted as an eye opener and brought Environment protection at the Centre stage. After which, there was a widening of existing environmental laws in the country and increase in judicial activity. The Supreme Court and High Court have worked from case to case for making environment as a fundamental right and then extending its meaning to right for compensation, clean water and air. The closure of limestone quarries in UP, halting of polluting tanneries along the Ganges river, the introduction of the principle of Absolute Liability for hazardous firms are some of the landmark decisions. In response to the court’s order different rules and policy changes have been developed such as CNG Policy in Delhi, Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules and Karnataka Municipal (Amendment) Act. However, the effectiveness of judicial activism in bringing about the social transformation is questionable. Although, the judiciary is able to form some strong foundation for environmental protection, but the developments brought about by judicial activism have been proven insufficient to bring satisfactory outcomes.

References

  1. Khosla M., Indian Supreme Court: Towards an Evolved Debate, Hastings Int’land Comp. L. Rev., 32(55), 55-100 (2009)
  2. Mehta P.B., The Rise of Judicial Sovereignty, J. Democracy, 18(2), 70-83 (2007)
  3. Krishnaswamy S., Democracy and Constitution in India: A Study of Basic Structure Doctrine, Oxford Univ. Press, (2011)
  4. Hand L., Spirit of Liberty Speech, Providence, Retrieved from http://www.providenceforum.org/spiritoflibertyspeech (2014)
  5. Rosencranz and Divan, Environmental Law and Policy in India, Oxford Univ. Press 2nd ed., (2011)
  6. Verma V.S., Bhopal the unfolding of Tragedy,Alternatives, 11,133-145 (1986)
  7. Hazarika S., Indian Journalist Offered Warning, N.Y. Times, (1984)
  8. Leela krishnan P., Environmental Law in India Lexis Nexis 3rd ed., (2012)
  9. Broughton E., The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review, Environ Health,4(1), 6 (2005)
  10. Senger D. S., Environmental Law, Prentice Hall of India (2007)
  11. Sarangi S., Bhopal Disaster: Judiciary's Failure, Econ. and Pol. Wkly., 30(46), 2907-2909 (1995)
  12. Bhopal Gas tragedy: A chronology of events, Hindu (2010)
  13. Dias A., Judicial activism in the development and enforcement of environmental law: some comparative insights from the Indian experience, J. Envtl. L, 6(2), 243-262 (1994)
  14. Verma S.K. and Kumar K., Fifty Years of Supreme Courtof India, Oxford Univ. Press (2000)
  15. Baxi U., Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Litigation Before the Supreme Court, Third World Legal Stud., 4(6), 107-132 (1985)
  16. Your Plan will take 200 years to clean Ganga: Supreme Court to Centre, Deccan Chronicle (2014)
  17. Supreme Court for Stage-Wise Plan to Restore Ganga to its Pristine Glory, Economic Times (2014)
  18. Mehta M.C., Growth of Environmental Jurisprudence in India, Acta Juridica, 75, 71-79 (1999)
  19. Anant T.C.A. and Singh J., An Economic Analysis of Judicial Activism, Econ. and Pol. Wkly., 37(43), 4433-4439 (2002)
  20. Das R. And Mukherji K., Complex Issues Management, Tata Mc Graw-Hill (2006)
  21. World Bank, For a breath of Fresh Air: Ten Years of Progress and Challenges in Urban Air Quality Management in India (1993-2002) (2005)
  22. Seetharam K. and Kashyap N., State of India’s Cities, Public Affairs Centre (2012)
  23. Rajamani L., Public Interest Environment Litigation in India: Exploring Issues of Access, Participation, Equity, Effectiveness and Sustainability, J. of Env. L.19(3), 293-321 (2007)
  24. Planning Commission of India, Report of Task Force on waste to Energy (Volume I): In the Context of Integrated waste Management (2014)
  25. C.G. Sankar and Ravi P., KSPCB Orders Mavallipura Landfill to Shutdown, Blame Game Begins, Citizen Matters (2012)
  26. Sripad A.M., BBMP Makes No Progress in Waste Segregation, Indian Express (2014)
  27. Mafia Controlling Solid Waste Management in City: Councilor, Hindu(2014)
  28. Clean India Mission beyond politics: PM Modi, Economic Times, (2014)