Survey on Impact of Traditional Handlooms Schemes: A Case Study at Madhya Pradesh, India
- 1Department of Studies in Business Administration, University of Mysore, Mysore, Karnataka, India
- 2Department of Studies in Business Administration, University of Mysore, Mysore, Karnataka, India
- 3DAVV, Indore, MP, India
Res. J. Management Sci., Volume 5, Issue (8), Pages 9-12, August,6 (2016)
India is a developing country with majority of its masses living in rural areas. Agriculture is the main source of employment providing work to 70 percent of the rural population. Next to agriculture handloom industry plays a dominant role in the economic development of the rural mass. Handlooms are scattered in the rural and semi-urban areas. The handloom industry is an important sector in providing large-scale employment and result in the upliftment of the rural mass development. Handloom is perhaps one of the oldest industries. Even the tribal people scattered throughout the country, produce their own cloths with the elegant designs, unique color combinations and lasting texture. This study indicates a review of literature relating to the handloom industry at Madhya Pradesh. Since in recent years the industry fell into deep crisis, few conference papers, research articles journals and some standard hypothetical management and maintenance thesis are published current problems of the industry and also the researcher tries to know the problems of the industry in brief through several studies done by Indian Universities with great support of primary data as well as secondary data.
- Zaheer Abdul (2013)., Handloom industry in Varanasi., PhD thesis, Banaras Hindu University, 87-95.
- Aloysius David Anterro (2011)., A study of handloom weaving in Malabar and South Canada districts., Ph. D Thesis, Bombay University, 137-209.
- AEPC (1999)., Handbook of Export Statistics of Apparel Export Promotion Council., AEPC, Govt. of India.
- Central Statistical Organisation (1994)., National Accounts Statistics of Ministry Planning by Government of India., Central Statistical Organisation, 78-136.
- Angadi V.B. (1975)., Handloom industry and issues relating to reservation., Southern Economist, 14(9), 31-43.
- Planning Commission steering committee report (1985)., The Seventh Five Year Plan 1985-90., 1, Government of India, New Delhi. retrieved from -www.planningcommission.gov.in.
- Shamasastry R. (1915)., Kautilya’s. Arthashastra., Government Press, Bangalore, 1-50.
- Rao S. B. et. al. (1978)., Management of Handloom Co-operatives (Policies, Programmers and Perspectives)., Vaikunth Mehta National Institute of Cooperatives Management, Pune, 27-56.
- Mehta R. (1996)., Textile and Apparel Trade: Impact of new Regionalism., Economic and Political Weekly, 3-4.
- Kalapesi Roshan (2000)., An interview for tribune., R Kalpesi a founder of Paramparik Karigar, an NGO.
- Somappa M. (2008)., Government’s Attitude towards handloom sector., Khadi gramodyog 17(1), retireved from -www.khadigramodyog.in.
- Uchikawa Shuji and Manohar (1998)., Liberalization and Growth of Indian textile Industry., United publications, 96-123.
- Shenai V.A. (1995)., History of Textile Design., Sevak Publications, Bombay, 136-179.