International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Proposal of an eco-design approach based on an inventory of fixtures: Case of agro-equipment SMEs in Benin

Author Affiliations

  • 1Polytechnic Institute of Grenoble, Laboratory G-SCOP, 46 avenue Felix Viallet, 38031 GRENOBLE Cedex1, France
  • 2School of Rural Engineering, National University of Agriculture, Laboratory LEMA, 01 BP 2009 COTONOU, Benin
  • 3National University of Sciences Technologies, Engineering and Mathematics, Laboratory LEMA, 01 BP 2009 COTONOU, Benin
  • 4Polytechnic Institute of Grenoble, Laboratory G-SCOP, 46 avenue Felix Viallet, 38031 GRENOBLE Cedex1, France

Res. J. Engineering Sci., Volume 8, Issue (3), Pages 8-19, September,26 (2019)

Abstract

The rise of environmental issues is encouraging mechanical manufacturing companies to integrate the environmental dimension into the design process of their products. In developing countries, small and medium-sized enterprises are recognized globally as the most job-creating and economic growth processors. However, they have shortcomings in using the eco design approach to eco innovate. In Benin, small units, agro-equipment developers, are facing enormous difficulties due to the lack of acquisition of sustainable design concepts. The present work aims to present in detail an eco-design approach and show how it meets the needs of OEMs. All this, in order to provide customers with particular values of use and appeal on the one hand and, on the other hand, to equipment manufacturers, competitive differentiation and economic value. The \\\"Innovation for Breaking and Sustainability (IBS)\\\" approach is a combination of \\\"Design for Sustainability: D4S\\\", \\\"Conception of Equipment in Southern Countries for Agriculture and Agri-Food, Method: (CESAM) And \\\"environmental assessment technique of standard NF E 01-005\\\" with the traditional methods of design and manufacture of these units, in order to reinforce their efficiency.

References

  1. Bonaiti J.P. (1994)., Environment adaptation to scientific anticipation., Industrial Engineering, economic issues, PUG.
  2. Azouma O.Y., Giroux F. and Varchon D. (2005)., Integration of manufacturing in the design of agricultural and agro-food equipment for Africa., Control of Processes to improve the quality and safety of food, Use of GMOs, Risk Analysis in agribusiness, Ouagadougou.
  3. Eco Design and Life Cycle Management (2014)., Guide Successful eco-design., Our success tips, Essential steps, Causes of failure.
  4. Godjo G.T. (2007)., Proposal of a method that promotes user integration throughout the design process., The method is called COSU (User-oriented Scenario Design), PhD Thesis in Industrial Engineering, INP-Grenoble.France. .
  5. Minister of the Environment, Housing and Urbanism (2012)., United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (RIO + 20)., Information document on sustainable development in Benin.
  6. Technical Center for Mechanical Industries: CETIM (2012)., Guide Successful eco-design, Our success tips, Essential steps, Causes of failure.,
  7. Standard NF E 01-005. (2014)., Methodology of eco-design for the products of Mechanical Second Edition French version carried at the European level (CEN TC406).,
  8. Eco Design and Life Cycle Management (2014)., Guide Successful eco-design, Our success tips, Essential steps, Causes of failure.,
  9. Marouze J.C. (1999)., Proposal of a method to control the technological trajectory of equipment in southern countries., Application to the agricultural and agri-food sector, PhD thesis in Industrial Engineering, ENSAM, Paris.
  10. Azouma Y.O. and Riopel D. (2007)., Proposal for a new concept called: Fully Integrated Logistics (LTI) in the design of equipment for Southern Countries., Logistics & Management, 18 - N ° 1, 2010.
  11. Azouma Y.O. (2006)., Implementation of the CESAM method on an organic fertilizer spreader., TROPICULTURA, 2007, 25,2, 76-81.
  12. UNEP UT Delft (2007)., Design for Sustainability: apractical approach for Developing Economies.,
  13. Michael D.K.L.W., Fabrice M., Daniel B. and Damien E. (2010)., Results of the first adaptation design for sustainability project in South Pacific small island developing state: Fiji., Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1775-1786.
  14. Daniela C.A.P, Evelyn T.Z, Américo G.F. and Aldo R.O. (2010)., Eco-design Methods focused on Remanufacturing., Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15-16), 1486-1355.
  15. Ali H.H. and Al Nsairat S.F. (2009)., Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries–Case of Jordan., Building and Environment, 44(5), 1053-1064.
  16. Julien G. (2015)., Development of a method for evaluating the environmental performance of incremental innovations., https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01142115. Mechanics. Thèse Ecole Centrale Paris, 2015. French..
  17. Romeiro Filho E. (2015)., Brazilian design for sustainability: in search of a local approach., Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 467-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.065.
  18. Winemaker F. and Patingre J.F. (2003)., Eco design: apply and communicate, Economica.,
  19. Cetim Ecoeff (2003)., Eco Design for Mechanics: How to Reconcile Design and Environment for Sustainable Development.,
  20. Jeanne R., Eric L. and Franck A. (2011)., The scientific tool as an instrument of objectification of environmental communication., Discussion of a use of the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA).Communications Research.No., 35.
  21. Abdennebi T., Hammouche A. and Tahon C. (2002)., Analysis of the company in an integration process., APII – JESA, 36(8), 1119-1154.
  22. Knoflacher M. (2002)., A conceptual model for integrated assessment., IEMS Congress, Lugano. ISBN 88-900787-0-7.