6th International Young Scientist Congress (IYSC-2020) will be Postponed to 8th and 9th May 2021 Due to COVID-19. 10th International Science Congress (ISC-2020).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Study of Diversity and Current Status of Butterflies (Rhopalocera) at Vasai Fort, Dist-Palghar, India

Author Affiliations

  • 1Viva College of Arts, Science and Commerce,Virar, Dist.-Palghar, Maharashtra, India
  • 2Viva College of Arts, Science and Commerce,Virar, Dist.-Palghar, Maharashtra, India
  • 3Viva College of Arts, Science and Commerce,Virar, Dist.-Palghar, Maharashtra, India
  • 4Viva College of Arts, Science and Commerce,Virar, Dist.-Palghar, Maharashtra, India
  • 5Viva College of Arts, Science and Commerce,Virar, Dist.-Palghar, Maharashtra, India
  • 6Viva College of Arts, Science and Commerce,Virar, Dist.-Palghar, Maharashtra, India

Int. Res. J. Biological Sci., Volume 5, Issue (3), Pages 11-19, March,10 (2016)


The great historical place Vasai fort is an ancient fort initiated by Bahadur Shah in 12th Century after that it was well established by Portuguese in the 15th Century and was later captured by Chimaji Appa in 17th Century. The area of study includes the entire Vasai fort, situated in Vasai (Bassein) Village and is inhabited by Fishermen. The area has floral biodiversity of trees, shrubs and wild plants and fauna includes insects, reptiles and aves. The present study was undertaken for a period of one year from June 2013 to July 2014 on Lepidopterans( butterflies species). The aim of this study was undertaken to explore the species richness and biodiversity of butterflies in and around Vasai fort. Butterflies are very sensitive to climate change and habitat degradation. They play an important role in the ecosystem as pollinators and are excellent indicator species. Butterflies were examined and photographed from the vicinity of Vasai fort. Butterflies belonging to five families and forty four species followed by Hesperiidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Lycaenidae and Nymphalidae were identified and recorded. Family Nymphalidae was the dominant family with 28 species which constituted 53.85% of the total butterflies recorded during the study period followed by Papilionidae(15.38%), Lycaenidae (13.46%) and Pieridae (11.54%), the least observed being from the Family Hesperiidae (5.77%).


  1. Tiple A.D. (2011)., Butterflies of Vidarbha region Maharashtra, India, A review with and implication for conservation., Journal of Threatened Taxa, 3(1), 1469-1477.
  2. Venkataramani G. (1986)., The shadow of extinction, Frontline., India’s National Magazine, (July 26 – August 8), 3, 58.
  3. Kocher S.D. and Williams E.H. (2000)., The Diversity and Abundance of North America Butterflies, Vary with Habi- tat Disturbance and Geography., Journal of Biogeography, 27, 785-794. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00454.x
  4. Kunte K.A. (2000)., Butterflies of Peninsular India., Indian Academy of Sciences, Universities Press (India) Limited, 254.
  5. Erhardt A. (1985)., Diurnal Lepidoptera: Sensitive Indicators of Cultivated and Abandoned Grassland., Journal of Ap- plied Ecology, 22, 849-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2403234
  6. Inuoye D.W. (2001)., Role of Pollinator Encyclopedia of Biodiversity., Volume 4. Academy Press, London, 732-730.
  7. Kremen C. (1994)., Biological Inventory Using Target Taxa: A Case Study of Butterflies in Rainforest of Madagascar., Journal of Ecological Applications, 4, 407-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1941946
  8. Tiple A.D. and Arun M.K. (2009)., Butterfly Species Diversity, Habitats and Seasonal Distribution in and Nagpur City, Central India., Journal of Natural History, 43, 855-884. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080 /00222930802610568
  9. Hammond P.C. and Miller J.C. (1998)., Comparism of the Biodiversity of Lepidoptera within Three Forested Ecosystems., Journal of Conservation Biology and Biodiversity, 91, 323-328.
  10. Pollard E. (1977)., A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies., Biological Conservation, 12(2), 115– 134.
  11. Varshney R.K. (1983)., Index Rhopalocera Indica Part II. Common names of butterflies from India and neighbouring countries., Records of Zoological Survey of India; Occassional Paper No. 47, 1- 49.
  12. Wynter-Blyth MA (1957)., Butterflies of the Indian Region., Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, 523,17
  13. Arora G.S. (1997)., Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera Fauna of Conservation Areas., Z.S.I. Fauna of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve; 9, 61-88.
  14. Tyagi R, Joshi PC and Joshi NC (2011)., Butterfly diversity of district Nainital, Uttarakhand, India., J Env Bio-Sci., 25(2), 273- 278.
  15. Tiple A.D., Khurad A.M. and Dennis R.L.H. (2007)., Butterfly diversity in relation to human-impact gradient on an Indian University campus., Nota Lepid, 30(1), 179-188.
  16. Kunte K. (2000)., Butterflies of Peninsular India., Universities Press, Hyderabad, India.
  17. Ramesh T., Hussain K.J., Selvanayagam M., Satpathy K.K. and Prasad M.V.R. (2010)., Patterns of Diversity, Abun- dance and Habitat Association of Butterflies Communities in Heterogeneous Landscapes of Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) Campus at Kalpakkam, South India., International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 2, 75-85.
  18. Pollard E. (1988)., Temperature, Rainfall and Butterfly Numbers., Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 819-828. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2403748
  19. Gascon C., Lovejoy T.E., Bierregaard R.O., Malcolm J.R., Stouffer P.C, Vasconceleos H.L., Laurance W.F., Zim Merman B., Tocher M. and Borges S. (1999)., Matrix Habitat and Species Richness in Tropical Forest Butterflies., Bio- logical Conservation, 91, 223-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00080-4
  20. Rickets T.H., Daily G.C. and Fay J.P. (200l)., Countryside Biogeography of Moths in a Fragmented Landscape: Bio- diversity in Native and Agricultural Habitats., Conservation Biology, 15, 378-388.