International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

The Potential for Using Stem and Branch of Bhadi (Lannea Coromandelica) As a Lignocellulosic Raw Material for Particleboard

Author Affiliations

  • 1Forestry and Wood Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna – 9208, BANGLADESH

Int. Res. J. Biological Sci., Volume 2, Issue (4), Pages 8-12, April,10 (2013)

Abstract

This study presents the potentiality of stem and branch particles of bhadi (Lannea coromandelica) tree as a lignocellulosic raw material for particleboard. Three types of three layer particleboard i.e., stem particleboard (SPB), branch particleboard (BPB) and stem-branch mixed particleboard (SBPB) were manufactured with 10% commercial urea formaldehyde (UF) resin. Physical properties i.e., density, moisture content (MC), water absorption (WA), thickness swelling (TS), Linear expansion (LE) and mechanical properties i.e., modulus of elasticity (MOE) and modulus of rupture (MOR) of the particleboards were investigated according to the procedure of ASTM D-1037 standard. Density of SPB, BPB and SBPB were 932, 787.5 and 854.83 Kg/m, respectively. MOE of SPB, BPB and SBPB were 2714 N/mm˛, 2010 N/mm˛ and 2509 N/mm˛, respectively. MOR of SPB, PB and SBPB were 23.31 N/mm˛, 14.65 N/mm˛ and 21.85 N/mm˛, respectively. Based on the particle types and percentage of particles in the formulation, the properties of bhadi particleboard varied. Among the three types of particleboard, SPB and SBPB particleboard met the minimum ANSI A208.1 requirements of physical and mechanical properties for H-2 grade particleboard. Also it was observed that, the properties of SPB and SBPB particleboard are comparable to the properties of commercial particleboard produced in Bangladesh.

References

  1. Islam M.A. Alam M.A. and Hannan M.O., Multiresponse optimization based on statistical response surface methodology and desirability function for the production of particleboard, Compos Part B,43, 861-868 (2012)
  2. Kalam M.K. Mohiuddin M. and Baasak S.R., Village trees of Bangladesh: Diversity and economic aspects, Bangladesh J. For. Sci., 25(1&2), 21-36 (1996)
  3. Ashaduzzaman M. and Sharmin A., Utilization of fast growing species for manufacturing medium density particleboard in Bangladesh, Proceedings of the International Panel Products Symposium. Cardiff, UK, 17-19 October 2007, 333-400 (2007)
  4. Sattar M.A. and Akhtaruzzaman A.F.M., Enduse classification of lesser used or unused wood species, Forest Products Branch, Forest Research Institute, Chittagong, Bangladesh, Bull, 36-66 (1997)
  5. Scheffer T.C. and Morrell J.J., Natural durability of wood: A worldwide checklist of species, Research Contribution 22, Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, 6-26 (1998)
  6. Cai Z., Wu Q., Lee J.N. and Hiziroglu S., Influence of board density, mat construction, and chip type on performance of particleboard made from eastern redcedar,For. Prod. J., 54(12), 226-232 (2004)
  7. Bowyer J.L., Shmulsky R. and Haygreen J.G., Forest Products and Wood Science – An Introduction. Fifth edition. Blackwell publishing professional, 2121 State Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50014, USA, 109-402 (2007)
  8. Hiziroglu S. and Holcomb R., Some of the properties of three-layer particleboard made from eastern redcedar, Build Environ,40, 719–723 (2005)
  9. ASTM (American Society for Testing Materials), Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-based fiber and particle panel materials static tests of timbers, D 1037-93, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA (1999)
  10. ANSI (American National Standards Institute), American National Standard for Particleboard, ANSI/A208.1. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Composite Panel Association, (1999)
  11. Panshin A.J. and De Zeeuw C.H., Textbook of Wood Technology. Vol. 1. FourthEdition. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, (1980)
  12. Hashemi S.K.H. and Kord B., Variation of within stem biometrical and physical property indices of wood from Cupressus sempervirens L. Bioresource,6(2), 1843-1857 (2011)
  13. Franz F.P., Kollmann E.W., Kuenzi A.J. and Stamm A.J., Principles of Wood Science and Technology, Wood based materials, Springer verlag, New York. Volume-. 457-505 (1975)
  14. Maloney T.M., Modern Particleboard and Dry-Process Fiberboard Manufacturing, Second edition, Miller Freeman Inc, San Francisco, (1993)
  15. Kalaycoglu H., Deniz I. and Hiziroglu S., Some of the properties of particleboard made from paulownia, J. Wood Sci., 51(4), 410–414 (2005)
  16. Nemli G. and Öztürk ., Influences of some factors on the formaldehyde content of particleboard, Build, Environ., 41, 770–774 (2006)
  17. Biswas D., Sheikh M.W., Hasnin S.M.M. and Ali M., Effect of water repellent additive on the properties of wood based particleboards, Bangladesh J. For. Sci., 24(1), 13-20 (1995)
  18. Nemli G., Hiziroglu S., Usta M., Serin Z., Ozdemir T. and Kalaycioglu H., Effect of residue type and tannin content on properties of particleboard manufactured from black locust, For. Prod. J., 54(2), 36-40 (2004)
  19. Gatchell C.J., Heebink B.G. and Hefty F.V., Influence of component variables on properties of particleboard for exterior use, For. Prod. J.,16(4), 46-59 (1966)
  20. Lehmann W.F., Properties of structural particleboard, For. Prod. J., 24(1), 19-26 (1974)
  21. Paridah M.T., Saifulazry S.O.A., Jalaluddin H., Zaidon A. and Rahim S., Mechanical and physical properties of particleboard made 4-year-old rubberwood of RRIM 2000 series clones, J. Tropical Forest Sci.,22, 440–447 (2010)
  22. Kelly M.W., Critical literature review of relationships between processing parameters and physical properties of particleboard, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, general technical report, fpl-10 (1977)
  23. Phelps J.E., Isebrands J.G. and Jewett D., Raw material quality of short rotation, intensively cultured Populus clones, I. A comparison of stem and branch properties at three spacings, IAWA Bull.,3 (3/4), 193– 200 (1982)
  24. Taylor F.W., A note on the relationship between branch and stem wood properties of selected hardwoods growing in the mid South. Wood Fiber Sci., 8(4), 257–261 (1977)
  25. Lehmann W.F. and Geimer R.L., Properties of structural particleboards from Douglas-fir residues, For. Prod. J.,24(10), 17-25 (1974)
  26. Pugel A., Price E. and Hse C., Composites from southern pine juvenile wood, Part I, For. Prod. J., 40(1), 29–33 (1989)