International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Importance of Exploration of Microbial Biodiversity

    ,

Author Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Microbiology, Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra, Haryana, INDIA

Int. Res. J. Biological Sci., Volume 1, Issue (3), Pages 78-83, July,10 (2012)

Abstract

The microbial world is the largest unexplored reservoir of biodiversity on the earth. It is an important frontier in biology under intensive investigations. The exploration of microbial diversity has been spurred by the fact that microbes are essential for life since they perform numerous functions essential for the biosphere that include nutrient recycling and environmental detoxification. The management and exploitation of microbial diversity has an important role in sustainable development with the industrial and commercial application of microbial diversity worth millions of rupees. Given the heterogeneity of natural environments and the enormous potential of microorganisms to provide novel pharmaceuticals, fine chemicals and new technologies, the biotechnology industry has a vast, largely untapped resource for the discovery of new chemicals and novel processes. However, despite the obvious economic value of microbial diversity, microorganisms have been largely ignored in debates on the conservation and management of global diversity. There is, therefore, an urgent need to persuade policy-maker to be more concerned about the conservation, management and exploitation of microbial diversity. There are a number of reasons why the conservation of microbial diversity has not received the same attention as plants and animals. For example, microorganisms are invisible, less familiar and perceived primarily as agents of disease. With respect to the role of microorganisms in sustainable development, little is known about the potential contribution of microbial diversity to the national economy, to wealth creation and to improvements in the quality of life. An appreciation of these factors might be one way of changing government and public perception of microorganisms by showing that the sustainable use of microbial diversity has positive economic value. This would help justify the costs involved in conserving microbial diversity, but equally provide a useful indicator of the costs of inaction. In terms of the scientific rationale needed to underpin policy, quantification of microbial diversity has been limited. This makes it difficult to indicate what needs to be conserved in order to support the biotechnology industries and to understand fully the interactions between organisms responsible for maintaining a functional ecosystem.

References

  1. Hooper D.U. and Vitousek P.M., The effects of plantcomposition and diversity on ecosystem processes, Science, 277, 1302-1305 (1997)
  2. Naeem S., Hahn D.R. and Schumann G., Producer decomposer codependency influence biodiversity effects, Nature, 403, 762-764 (2000)
  3. Mikola J. and Setala H., Relating species diversity to ecosystem functioning: mechanistic backgrounds and experimental approach with a decomposer food web, Oikas, 83, 189-194 (1996)
  4. Van der Heijden M.G.A., Klironomos J.N., Ursic M., Moutoglis P., Streitwolf E.R., Boller T., Wiemken A. and Sanders I.R., Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity, Nature, 396, 69-72 (1998)
  5. Naeem S., Thompson I.J., Lawler S.P., Lawton J.H. and Woodfin R.M., Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems, Nature, 368, 734-737 (1994)
  6. Morin P.J., The complexity of codependency, Nature, 403,718- 719 (2000)
  7. Harte J. and Kinzig A.P., Mutualism and competition between plants and decomposers: implications for nutrient allocation in ecosystems, Am. Nat., 141, 829-846 (1993)
  8. Zedan H., The economic value of microbial diversity, Biotechnology, 43, 178-185 (1993)
  9. Doran J.W., Parkin T.B., Defining and assessing soil quality, In J.W. Doran (eds.) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment,SSSA Spec. Publ. 35. SSSA, Madison, WI, 3-21(1994)
  10. Staben M.L., Bezdicek D.F., Smith J.L., Fauci M.F., Assessment of soil quality in conservation research programmed and wheat-fallow soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61, 124-130 (1997)
  11. Torsvik V., Salte K., Sorheim R. and Goksoyr J., Comparison of phenotypic diversity and DNA heterogeneity in a population of soil bacteria, Appl. Environ. Micrbiol., 56, 776-781 (1990)
  12. Torsvik V., Goksoyr J., Daae F., High diversity of DNA of soil bacteria, Appl. Envion. Microbiol., 56, 782-787 (1990)
  13. Klug M. and Tiedje J, Response of microbial communities to changing environmental conditions: Chemical and physiological approaches, in R. Guerrero, R. and C. Pedros-Alio C (eds.) Trends in microbial ecology, Barcelona: Spanish society for microbiology, 371-378 (1994)
  14. Singh V., Joshi B.B., Awasthi S.K. and Srivastava S.N., Eco-freindly management of red rot disease of sugarcane, Sugar Tech.,10, 158- 161 (2008a)Singh V, Srivastava S.N, Lal R.J, Awasthi S.K, Joshi B.B (2008b)
  15. Singh K. and Srivastava S.N., Mycoflora of underground parts of poorly sprouted stubble, Indian Phytopath, 37, 126-131 (1984)
  16. Embley T. and Stackebrandt E., The use of 16 S ribosomal RNA sequences in microbial ecology, In Pickup R., Saunders J. and Codd G. (eds.), Ecological approaches to environmental microbiology, Oxford: Chapman and Hall, (1994)
  17. Chandra S. and Kehri H.K., Biotechnology of VAM – Indian Senario, New Delhi publishing agency, Pritampura, New Delhi- 110088,413 (2006)