9th International Science Congress (ISC-2019).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Geological characteristics, technical status, future prospects and challenges of Shale Gas Exploitation in India

Author Affiliations

  • 1Department of Petroleum Engineering, Presidency University, Bengaluru, India
  • 2Department of Petroleum Engineering, Presidency University, Bengaluru, India
  • 3Department of Petroleum Engineering, Presidency University, Bengaluru, India
  • 4Department of Petroleum Engineering, Presidency University, Bengaluru, India

Int. Res. J. Earth Sci., Volume 7, Issue (3), Pages 29-33, September,25 (2019)

Abstract

The shale gas revolution has aided the United States to achieve energy independence and has turned around the pattern of world oil and gas supply by motivating the other counties to move towards the exploitation of unconventional reservoirs like shale gas. In unconventional resource like Shale Gas, the flow of natural gas is limited/restricted without the use of artificial cranks because of its very low permeability. India's dependency on oil or gas imports can be substantially reduced by sustainably developing shale gas reserves. Since India is at an earlier stage of shale gas exploitation, there is a huge gap between India and the United States in terms of expertise, resources and technology. This paper analyses the current situation of shale gas exploitation in India and discusses the issues (pad drilling, multi-stage horizontal fracturing, and environmental impacts, etc.) which are constraining its development in India. This paper also discusses the geology of shale gas formation in India, the technical status of its exploitation and the future development prospects associated with its exploitation.

References

  1. Jing W., Huiquing L., Rongna G., Aihong K. and Mi Z. (2011)., A new technology for the exploration of shale gas reservoirs., Petroleum Science and Technology, 29, 2450-2459.
  2. Wang Q., Chen Xi., Jha A.N. and Rogers H. (2014)., Natural gas from shale formation-the evolution, Evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution inUnited States., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 1-28.
  3. Anjirwala H. and Bhatia M. (2016)., Shale Gas Scenario in India and Comparison with USA., International Journal of Science and Research, 5(8), 1069-1075. Speight, J. G. 2017. Deep Shale Oil and Gas. 1st ed., Gulf Professional Publishing, United States.
  4. Mahto V. (2019)., Shale Gas in India: Status and Challenges., Journal of Petroleum Engineering & Technology, 4(1), 23-32.
  5. Ariketi R., Behera B.K. and Bhui U.K. (2015)., Shale Gas in India- Challenges and Opportunities., International Journal of Scientific Research., 4, 320-325.
  6. Carter K.E., Hammack R.W. and Hakala J.A. (2013)., Hydraulic fracturing and organic compounds-uses, disposal and challenges. In SPE Eastern Regional Meeting., Society of Petroleum Engineers.
  7. Reporet (2012)., United States Environmental Protection Agency ProgressReport on Study of Potential Impacts of Hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources.,
  8. Colborn T., Kwiatkowski C., Schultz K. and Bachran M. (2011)., Natural gas operations from a public health perspective., Human and ecological risk assessment: An International Journal, 17(5), 1039-1056.
  9. Lee D.S., Herman J.D., Elsworth D., Kim H.T. and Lee H.S. (2011)., A critical evaluation of unconventional gas recovery from the marcellus shale, northeastern United States., KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(4), 679-686.
  10. Spellman T. and Valle J.E. (2012)., Environmental Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing., London GBR, Engineering.
  11. Rahim Z. and Holditch S.A. (2003)., Effects of fracture fluid degradation on underground fracture dimensions and production increase., Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 37(1-2), 97-111.
  12. Jenner S. and Lamadrid A.J. (2013)., Shale gas vs. coal: Policy implications from environmental impact comparisons of shale gas, conventional gas, and coal on air, water, and land in the United States., Energy Policy, 53, 442-453.
  13. Report (2013)., Directorate General of Hydrocarbon report Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production Activities India.,
  14. Saheb S.U., Seshaiah S. and Viswanath B. (2012)., Environment and their legal issues in India., International Research Journal of Environment Sciences, 1(3), 44-51.
  15. Kucuk F. and Sawyer W.K. (1979)., Modeling of Devonian Shale Gas Reservoir Performance., Proc., Third Eastern Gas Shales Symposium, Morgantown, WV, 247-276.
  16. Streltsova T.D. (1983)., Well pressure behavior of a naturally fractured reservoir., Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 23(05), 769-780.
  17. Schettler P.D., Parmely C.R. and Lee W.J. (1989)., Gas storage and transport in Devonian shales., SPE Formation Evaluation, 4(03), 371-376.
  18. Al-Hussainy R., Ramey Jr H.J. and Crawford P.B. (1966)., The flow of real gases through porous media., journal of Petroleum Technology, 18(05), 624-636.
  19. Zielinski R.E. and McIver R.D. (1981)., Resource and exploration assessment of the oil and gas potential in the Devonian gas shales of the Appalachian Basin., (No. DOE/DP-0053-1125; MLM-MU-86-61-0002). Monsanto Research Corp., Miamisburg, OH (USA). Mound.