International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Software defined network

    , ,

Author Affiliations

  • 1Bhilai Institute of Technology, Durg, CG, India
  • 2Bhilai Institute of Technology, Durg, CG, India
  • 3Bhilai Institute of Technology, Durg, CG, India

Res. J. Computer & IT Sci., Volume 5, Issue (7), Pages 15-18, September,20 (2017)

Abstract

The traditional network needs to change the entire affected devices in order to maintain the flow. It was time consuming and many questions have been raised on the scalability and flexibility. It’s quite difficult to manage the complex network and maintain pace with the increasing demands. Software Defined Network provides the architecture to manage the large complex networks. Open-flow protocol is used for separation of control plane and data plane. Here the centralized controller is used to decide the forwarding of packets. This paper represents the brief review of SDN. The advantages and limitations of SDN have been discussed. Various simulation tools with supporting experimental analysis is being enlightened.

References

  1. Yang Jun, Dai Bin, Lv Lu and Xu Guan (2015)., Coding Open-flow: Enable network coding in SDN networks., International journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 7(5), 29-38.
  2. Yamei F., Qing L. and Qi H. (2016)., Research and Comparative analysis of performance test on SDN Controllers., 1st IEEE Conference on Computer Communication and the internet, 207-210.
  3. Nunes Bruno Astuto A., Mendonca Marc, Xuan-Nam Nguyen, Obraczka Katia and Turletti Thierry (2014)., A Survey of Software Defined Networking: Past, Present, and future of Programmable Networks., hal-00825087,version 1, may 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1617-1634.
  4. Salman Ola, Elhajj Imad H., Kayssi Ayman and Chehab Ali (2016)., SDN Controllers: A Comparative Study., Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), 18th Mediterranean, IEEE.
  5. Sood K., Yu S. and Xiang Y. (2016)., Software Defined Wireless Networking Opportunities and Challenges for Internet-Of-hings: A Review., IEEE Internet Of Things Journal, 3(4), 453-463.
  6. Jo J., Lee S. and Kim J. (2014)., Software Defined Home Networking Devices for Multi-home Visual Sharing., IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 60(3), 534-539,
  7. Gupta L. (2013)., SDN: Development, Adoption and Research Trends.,
  8. Isata P. and Guan L. (2016)., Performance Benchmarking of SDN Experimental Platforms., IEEE, 116-120.
  9. Rawat D. and Bajracharya C. (2016)., Software Defined Networking for reducing energy consumption and carbon emission., IEEE.
  10. Keti F. and Askar S. (2015)., Emulation of Software Defined Networks using Mininet in Different Simulation Environments., 6th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation, 205-210.
  11. Nde G. and Khondoker R. (2016)., SDN Testing and Debugging Tools: A Survey., 5th International Conference on Information Electronics and Vision, 631-635.
  12. Wang Fei-Yue, Yang Liuqing, Cheng Xiang, Han Shuangshuang and Yang Jian (2016)., Network Softwarization and Parallel Networks: Beyond Software Defined Networks., IEEE Network, 30(4), 60-65.
  13. Abu-Jassar A. (2015)., Mathematical Tools for SDN Formalisation and Verification., 2015 second International Scientific-practical Conference , PIC S&T, 35-38
  14. Staessens Dimitri, Sharma Sachin, Colle Didier, Pickavet Mario and Demeester Piet (2011)., Software Defined Networking: Meeting Carrier Grade Requirements., Local & Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN), 2011 18th IEEE Workshop on, 1-6.
  15. Metter Christopher, Gebert Steffen, Lange Stanislav, Zinner Thomas, Tran-Gia Phuoc and Jarschel Michael (2015)., Investigating The Impact of Network Topology on the Processing Times of SDN Controllers, IFIP 2015, 1214-1219.
  16. Cammarata Giovanni, Stefano Antonella Di, Morana Giovanni and Zito Daniele (2016)., Evaluating the Performance of A4SDN on various network topologies., 2016 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops, 801-808.
  17. Sabeeh Ann, Al-Dunainawi Yousif, Maysam Abbod F. and Al-Raweshidy H.S. (2016)., A Hybrid Intelligent Approach for Optimising Software Defined Networks Performance., International conference on Information Communication and Management, 47-51.
  18. McKeown Nick, Anderson Tom, Balakrishnan Hari, Parulkar Guru, Peterson Larry, Rexford Jennifer, Shenker Scott and Turner Jonathan (2008)., Open-Flow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Network., ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2), 69-74.
  19. Luo S., Wu J., Li Jianhua and Guo Longhua (2016)., A Multistage Attack Mitigation Mechanism for Software Defined Home Networks., IEEE Transactions on consumer electronics, 62(2), 200-207.
  20. Yao Xibo, Wang Hua, Gao Chuangen and Yi Shanwen (2016)., Maximizing Network Utilization for SDN Based on Particle Swarm Optimization., IEEE 28th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 921-925.
  21. Yi Shanwen, Wang Hua, Yao Xibo, Gao Chuangen and Zhai Linbo (2016)., Maximizing Network Utilization for SDN Based on Wise Ant Colony Optimization., IEEE, 18th conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City, IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems, 959-966.