International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Pulses production in India and Nigeria: Panacea to Food Security

Author Affiliations

  • 1Dept. of Agri. Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India
  • 2Dept. of Agric. Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Vijayapur, India

Res. J. Agriculture & Forestry Sci., Volume 4, Issue (6), Pages 11-19, June,8 (2016)


Pulses are precious leguminous crops especially to those living in semi-arid countries. Its resilience in withstanding poor ecological conditions and its high food and fodder value makes it a commodity that can turn around the fortunes of smallholder farmers and in providing cheapest source of plant protein in both India and Nigeria. A compound growth rate model was used in estimating the trend of area, production and productivity of different types of pulses from the year 1980 to 2015 for both India and Nigeria. The estimated time trend variable revealed a positive trend. However, fluctuations were observed with respect to area, production and productivity of different pulses in both countries, but relatively lower fluctuation in productivity. Furthermore, mean average productivity of soya bean and pulse nes in India was slightly higher than that of Nigeria despite been lower to the world average which was 0.86 ton/ha. In Indian there was accelerative growth trend in area and production of all pulses category but productivity recorded stagnation for black gram and pigeon pea; deceleration for chick pea, green pea and pulse nes; and acceleration for green gram and soya bean. However, in Nigeria, there was deceleration for area and production while acceleration trend for productivity of cowpea dry, soya bean and pulse nes respectively. It conclude that, although area and production trend was decelerating but productivity trend was accelerating in Nigeria, at the same vain, the productivity was slightly lower compared to India. The study therefore, suggest Nigeria need to emphasis the use of high yielding varieties, input and credit support to boost productivity of pulse as major source of cheap plant protein their by improve the nutritional security especially among the Nigerian poor. Likewise, promote diversification into large scale cultivation of pulses such as pigeon pea, chick pea, black and green gram. At the same time, India needs to support research institution to develop higher yielding varieties of pulses, support farmers with inputs, technology and credit towards achieving optimum yield; improving farmer’s income, increasing the local supply of pulses and reducing import, employment opportunities and closing the nutritional security gap in a vegetarian nation.


  1. Uzoechina O.B. (2009)., Nutrient and anti-nutrients potentials of brown pigeon pea (Cajanuscajanvar bicolor) seed flours., Nigerian Food Journal, 27, 10-16.
  2. Apata D.F. and Ologhobo A.D. (1997)., Trypsin inhibitor and the other anti-nutritional factors in tropical legume seeds., Tropical Science, 37, 52-59.
  3. Ihekoronye A.I. and Ngoddy P.O. (1985)., Integrated Food Science and Technology for Tropics., Macmillan Publishers Ltd. London. pp 284.
  4. Yude C. and Keqin R. (1993)., Centre for Health Statistics Information, Ministry of Public Health, PR China, Li Liandi, The National Cancer Research and Control Office, P, R. China, Beijing; Analysis on the Mortality Pattern and Its Related Factors of the Leading Ten Malignant Tumors in China [J]., Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 4.
  5. Jukanti A.K., Gaur P.M., Gowda C.L.L., and Chibbar R.N. (2012)., Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (CicerrietinumL.): A review., British Journal of Nutrition. 108, S11-S26.
  6. Borget M. (1992)., Food Legumes., Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation.
  7. Kormawa P.M., Chianu J.N. and Manyong V.M. (2002)., Cowpea demand and supply patterns in West Africa: the case of Nigeria., Challenges and opportunities for enhancing sustainable cowpea production. Fatokun CA, Tarawali SA, Singh BB, Kormawa PM, Tamo M (eds). IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp.375-386.
  8. Reddy A. Amarender (2004)., Consumption patter, trade and production potential of pulses., Economic and Political Weekly. 34(44), 4854-4860.
  9. Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) (2010)., FAO Statistical Data Base.,,
  10. Laxmipathi G.C.L., Srinivasan S., Gaur P.M. and Saxena K.B. (2014)., Enhancing the Productivity and Production of Pulses in India., undefined
  11. Ortiz R., (1998)., Cowpeas from Nigeria: a silent food revolution., Outlook on agriculture, 27(2):125-128.
  12. Mortimore M.J., Singh B.B., Harris F. and Blade S.F. (1997)., Cowpea in traditionalcropping systems. in Advances in cowpea research, edited by B.B. Singh, D.R. Mohan Raj, K.E. Dashiell, and L.E.N. Jackai., Copublication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS). IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.Pages 99–113
  13. Bressani R. (1985)., Nutritive value of cowpea in Cowpea: research, production and utilization., , edited by S.R. Singh and K.O. Rachie, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA. Pages 353–360
  14. Marchenko Y. (2009)., Multiple-imputation Analysis Using Stata’s mi Command., Presentation given to the 2009 UK Stata Users Group Meeting, London, UK, on September 10., 2009. StataCorp