International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Prevalence and Adoption of Agroforestry Technologies and Practices in Semi-Arid Regions of West-Pokot County, Kenya

    , , , ,

Author Affiliations

  • 1School of Natural Resource and Environmental Management, University of Kabianga, 2030-20200, Kericho, KENYA
  • 2School of Natural Resource and Environmental Management, University of Kabianga, 2030-20200, Kericho, KENYA
  • 3School of Environmental Studies, University of Eldoret, 1125-30100, Eldoret, KENYA
  • 4Kenya Forestry Research Institute, 382-20202, Londiani, KENYA
  • 5School of Natural Resource Management, University of Eldoret, 1125-30100, Eldoret, KENYA

Res. J. Agriculture & Forestry Sci., Volume 3, Issue (6), Pages 6-15, June,8 (2015)

Abstract

Apart from being few, studies on agroforestry in ASALs have failed to consider different categories of farmers depending on the number of years they have practiced the technology. This has led to scanty information to the advocators of agroforestry and individual farmers in need of agroforestry information. This study therefore determined effective agroforestry technologies suitable for Kenya’s ASALs based on the prevalence and adoption levels in Chepareria and Lelan sub-locations of West-Pokot County. The study employed independent group research design. A total of 181 households were selected (90 in Chepareria and 91 in Lelan from a target population of 2199 households). Data was collected through questionnaires, key informants drawn from field officers and contact farmers, and direct field observation. Mann-Whitney U test and kruskal Wallis test were used to analyze data with the aim of determining significant differences between and among independent groups. The results indicated that most common agroforestry technologies include boundary tree planting, home-garden, woodlot, scattered trees, alley cropping, and fodder bank. The six technologies across the study area were dominated by boundary tree planting (Chepareria 63.4%, Lelan 68%). However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of agroforestry technologies between the sub-locations (U = 1685, d.f= 1, N= 181, P= 0.378). In addition, the difference in the adoption levels of the six technologies between the sub-locations was statistically insignificant (U = 3196.500, N= 181, d.f 1, P > 0.05). However, kruskal Wallis test indicated significant difference within adoption levels in sub-location [(Chepareria ?2= 312.132, d.f =5, N = 90, P =.0000), (Lelan ?2 =145.674, d.f = 5, N = 91, P=.0000)]. At the adopters’ level, boundary planting had a significantly higher number of households as compared to any other technology. In this regard, extension officers need to organize for training to create awareness and empower farmers on least prevalent and non-adopted technologies.

References

  1. Manyeki J., Kubasu D., Kirwa E. and Mnene N., Assessment of Socio-Economic Factors InfluencingAdoption of Natural Pastures Improvement Technologiesin Arid And Semi-Arid Lands of Kenya, LivestockResearch for Rural Development, 25(11), (2013)
  2. Bogdanski A., Integrated Food–Energy Systems forClimate-Smart Agriculture, Agriculture and FoodSecurity, 1(9), 1-9 (2012)
  3. Kyule N., Konyango J. and Nkurumwa O., Promoting Evergreen Agriculture among Secondary Schools in Aridand Semi-Arid Lands of Kenya, International Journal ofScientific Research and Innovative Technology, 2(3), 1-8(2015)
  4. Coe R., Sinclair F. and Barrios E., Scaling upAgroforestry Requires Research ‘in’ Rather than ‘For’Development, Current Opinion in EnvironmentalSustainability, 6(4), 73–77 (2014)
  5. Johansson K., Axelsson R. and Kimanzu N., Mapping theRelationship of Inter-Village Variation in AgroforestryTree Survival with Social and Ecological Characteristics:The Case of the Vi Agroforestry Project, Mara Region,Tanzania, Sustainability, 5(12), 5171-5194 (2013)
  6. Jerneck A and Olsson L, More than Trees!Understanding the Agroforestry Adoption Gap inSubsistence Farming: Insights from Narrative Walks inKenya, Journal of Rural Studies, 32,114-125 (2013)
  7. Parwada C., Gadzirayi T., Karvina C. and Munyati V., A Review of Agro-Forestry Technologies Adoption amongSmall-Holder Farmers in Zimbabwe, Journal ofSustainable Development Studies, 1(1), 68-92 (2012)
  8. Öborn I., Kuyah S., Jonsson M., Dahlin A., Mwangi H.and de Leeuw J., Landscape-Level Constraints andOpportunities for Sustainable Intensification inSmallholder Systems in the Tropics, In Minang, P. A.,van Noordwijk, M., Freeman, O. E., Mbow, C., deLeeuw, J., and Catacutan, D. (Eds.) Climate-SmartLandscapes: Multifunctionality in Practice, 163-177,Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF),(2015)
  9. Bishaw B., Neufeldt H., Mowo J., Abdelkadir A.,Muriuki J., Gemedo D., Tewodros A., Guillozet K.,Habtemariam K., Dawson I., Eike L. and Cheikh M., Farmers’ Strategies for Adapting to and MitigatingClimate Variability and Change through Agroforestry inEthiopia and Kenya, Oregon State University, Corvallis,Oregon, (2013)
  10. Van der Horst D., Vermeylen S. and Kuntashula E., The Hedgification of Maizescapes? Scalability andMultifunctionality of Jatropha curcas Hedges in a MixedFarming Landscape in Zambia, Ecology and Society,19(2), 48-58 (2014)
  11. Dharmasena P. and Bhat M., Economic Analysis ofMultipurpose Agroforestry Plantation in Abandoned TeaLands in Mid Country of Sri Lanka, Journal ofAgricultural Research, 50(2), 271-278 (2012)
  12. Buyinza J., Agaba H., Ongodia G., Eryau K., Sekatuba J.,Kalanzi F., Kwaga P., Mudondo S. and Nansereko S., On-farm Conservation and Use Values of IndigenousTrees Species in Uganda, Res. J. Agriculture andForestry Sci, 3(3), 19-25 (2015)
  13. Jyoti A., Kumar M. and Kumar R., Plant GrowthPromoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): An Alternative ofChemical Fertilizer for Sustainable, EnvironmentFriendly Agriculture, Res. J. Agriculture and ForestrySci, 1(4), 21-23 (2013)
  14. Ojeleye O., Fadiji T. and Adebisi O., Influence ofProductivity Enhancing Farm Practices on FarmersIncome in the Nigerian Sudan Savanna, Res. J.Agriculture and Forestry Sci, 2(10), 1-4 (2014)
  15. Mutonyi S. and Fungo B., Patterns of AgroforestryPractices among Small-Holder Farmers in the LakeVictoria Crescent Zone (LVCAEZ) of Uganda, ResearchJournal of Applied Sciences, 6(4), 251-257 (2011)
  16. Chandra K., Sharma D.K., Meher L.C., Kulkarni A.V.and Nasim M., Studies of Feasibility of Intercropping ofCamelina sativa in Jatropha Plantation in Semi: AridClimate in Andhra Pradesh, India, Res. J. Agricultureand Forestry Sci, 2(2), 23-26 (2014)
  17. Parvatiya V., Agroforestry: A way to Conserve MPTs inNorth Western Himalaya, Res. J. Agriculture andForestry Sci, 1(9), 8-13 (2013)
  18. Kelly S., Literature Review on the Diffusion ofInnovations and Best Practice for Technology Transfer, New Zealand: Environmental Science and ResearchLimited, (2012)
  19. Lukuyu B., Place F., Franzel S. and Kiptot E., Disseminating Improved Practices: Are VolunteerFarmer Trainers Effective?, Journal of AgriculturalEducation and Extension, 18(5), 525-540 (2012)
  20. Buttoud G., Ajayi O., Detlefsen G., Place F. andTorquebiau E., Advancing Agroforestry on the PolicyAgenda: A Guide For Decision, Agroforestry WorkingPaper no. 1. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization ofthe United Nations, (2013)